Karl Barth and Ramsey's "Uses of Power"

Journal of Religious Ethics 19 (2):1 - 30 (1991)
Abstract
Paul Ramsey's criticism of Karl Barth 's Christological account of the state was based on a misconception of Barth's eschatology, but reflected, for all that, real differences in theology and political theory. The theological differences were susceptible of reconciliation, possibly to both thinkers' advantage; but differences of political theory, hardly recognised, which turned upon the legacy of contractarianism in Western liberal thought, kept their views apart.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 12,068
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Darren O. Sumner (2011). Common Actualization: Karl Barth's Recovery and Reappropriation of the Communication of Natures. Neue Zeitschrift Für Systematische Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 53 (4):465-479.
Nicholas Wolterstorff (1996). Barth on Evil. Faith and Philosophy 13 (4):584-608.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-05-29

Total downloads

4 ( #267,530 of 1,101,833 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #306,516 of 1,101,833 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.