Berkeley's Assessment of Locke's Epistemology
In Stephen H. Daniel (ed.), Reexamining Berkeley's Philosophy (2007)
| Abstract | In this essay, the author analyses Berkeleys conformity and inference argument against Lockes theory of percep tion. Both arguments are not as decisive as traditionally has been perceived and fail to engage in Lockes actual position. The main reason for this is that Berkeley does not see that Lockes position is compatible with the non-inferential nature of perceptual knowledge | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesKenneth L. Pearce (forthcoming). Berkeley's Lockean Religious Epistemology. Journal of the History of Ideas.
George C. Caffentzis (2010). Locke, Berkeley, and Hume as Philosophers of Money. In Silvia Parigi (ed.), George Berkeley: Religion and Science in the Age of Enlightenment. Springer.
Donald L. M. Baxter (1997). Abstraction, Inseparability, and Identity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (2):307-330.
I. C. Tipton (ed.) (1977). Locke on Human Understanding: Selected Essays. Oxford University Press.
E. J. Lowe (2003). Identity, Individuality, and Unity. Philosophy 78 (3):321-336.
George Berkeley (1940/2003). A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Dover Publications.
Fred Ablondi (2012). Hutcheson, Perception, and the Sceptic's Challenge. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (2):269-281.
Daniel Garber (1987). Something-I-Know-Not-What: Berkeley on Locke on Substance. In Ernest Sosa (ed.), Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley. D. Reidel.
Daniel Garber (1982). Locke, Berkeley, and Corpuscular Scepticism. In Colin Murray Turbayne (ed.), Berkeley: Critical and Interpretive Essays. University of Minnesota Press.
Steven M. Nadler (1990). Berkeley's Ideas and the Primary/Secondary Distinction. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20 (1):47-61.
Margaret D. Wilson (1982). Did Berkeley Completely Misunderstand the Basis of the Primary-Secondary Quality Distinction in Locke? In Colin M. Turbayne (ed.), Berkeley: Critical and Interpretive Essays.
Konrad Marc-Wogau (1968). The Argument From Illusion and Berkeley's Idealism. In C. B. Martin & David M. Armstrong (eds.), Locke and Berkeley. University of Notre Dame Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2011-11-19Total downloads1 ( #274,556 of 549,005 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 549,005 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
