This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
17 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
  1. Fred Ablondi (2005). Berkeley, Archetypes, and Errors. Southern Journal of Philosophy 43 (4):493-504.
  2. Robert Merrihew Adams (1987). Berkeley and Epistemology. In Ernest Sosa (ed.), Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley. D. Reidel.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. A. C. Armstrong (1914). Bergson, Berkeley, and Philosophical Intuition. Philosophical Review 23 (4):430-438.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Michael Ayers (2005). Was Berkeley an Empiricist or a Rationalist? In Kenneth Winkler (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley. Cambridge University Press. 34.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Daniel Flage (2008). Berkeley's Epistemic Ontology : The Three Dialogues. In Stephen H. Daniel (ed.), New Interpretations of Berkeley's Thought. Humanity Books.
  6. Daniel E. Flage (2004). Berkeley's Epistemic Ontology: The Principles. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (1):25 - 60.
  7. David S. Forth (1971). Berkeley and Buber: An Epistemological Comparison. Dialogue 10 (04):690-707.
  8. Lesley Friedman (2003). Pragmatism: The Unformulated Method of Bishop Berkeley. Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (1):81-96.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. M. A. Kanu (2007). Berkeley's Idealism: Critique of John Locke's Epistemology. Sophia: An African Journal of Philosophy 7 (2).
  10. Ted Kinnaman (2002). Epistemology and Ontology In Kant's Critique of Berkeley. Idealistic Studies 32 (3):203-220.
    Despite apparent similarities between them, in the Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics and in the second edition of the Critique of Pure Reason Kant makes several attempts to distinguish his idealism from Berkeley’s. I argue that Kant’s arguments in three of the four places where he explicitly distances himself from Berkeley are insufficient to their task because they attack only Berkeley’s empiricism rather than his immaterialism. Although a close reading of the Refutation of Idealism lies beyond the scope of this (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. André Moreau (1966). Le Problème de la raison chez Berkeley. Dialogue 5 (02):154-183.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Vance G. Morgan (1993). Kant and Dogmatic Idealism: A Defense of Kant's Refutation of Berkeley. Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (2):217-237.
  13. Robert Muehlmann (1978). Berkeley's Ontology and the Epistemology of Idealism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 8 (1):89 - 111.
  14. George S. Pappas (2007). Berkeley's Assessment of Locke's Epistemology. In Stephen H. Daniel (ed.), Reexamining Berkeley's Philosophy.
    In this essay, the author analyses Berkeley’s conformity and inference argument against Locke’s theory of percep tion. Both arguments are not as decisive as traditionally has been perceived and fail to engage in Locke’s actual position. The main reason for this is that Berkeley does not see that Locke’s position is compatible with the non-inferential nature of perceptual knowledge.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Vincent G. Potter (ed.) (1993). Readings in Epistemology: From Aquinas, Bacon, Galileo, Descartes, Locke, Berkeley, Hume, Kant. Fordham University Press.
    A companion volume to On Understanding Understanding, this second edition incorporates corrections to the previous text and includes new readings. The works collected in this volume are mainly from the British Empiricists. The breadth of the selection is not so diverse that the pieces cannot be readily understood by a newcomer to Epistemology, they have a logical progression of development (from Locke to Berkeley to Hume), and all of the philosophers whose work is represented have had great influence on contemporary (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. William H. Trapnell (1988). The Treatment of Christian Doctrine by Philosophers of the Natural Light From Descartes to Berkeley. Voltaire Foundation at the Taylor Institution.
  17. Peter S. Wenz (1986). The Critique of Berkeley's Empiricism In Orwell's 1984. Idealistic Studies 16 (2):133-152.