Taking life and the argument from potentiality
Midwest Studies in Philosophy 24 (1):186–197 (2000)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRichard Francis Galvin (1988). Noonan's Argument Against Abortion: Probability, Possibility and Potentiality. Journal of Social Philosophy 19 (2):80-89.
Jeffrey Reiman (1993). The Impotency of the Potentiality Argument for Fetal Rights: Reply to Wilkins. Journal of Social Philosophy 24 (3):170-176.
Elizabeth Harman (2003). The Potentiality Problem. Philosophical Studies 114 (1-2):173 - 198.
Mary B. Mahowald (2004). Respect for Embryos and the Potentiality Argument. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (3):209-214.
Jan Deckers (2005). Why Current Uk Legislation on Embryo Research is Immoral. How the Argument From Lack of Qualities and the Argument From Potentiality Have Been Applied and Why They Should Be Rejected. Bioethics 19 (3):251–271.
Chris Meyers (2010). The Fetal Position: A Rational Approach to the Abortion Debate. Prometheus Books.
Alfonso Gómez-Lobo (2004). Does Respect for Embryos Entail Respect for Gametes? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (3):199-208.
John P. Lizza (2010). Potentiality and Persons at the Margins of Life. Diametros 26:44-57.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads15 ( #79,731 of 556,840 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,840 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
