Plural Quantification and the Iterative Concept of Set

Philosophy Research Archives 11:579-587 (1985)
Arecent paper by George Boolos suggests that it is philosophically respectable to use monadic second order logic in one’s explication of the iterative concept of set. I shall here give a partial indication of the new range of theories of the iterative hierarchy which are thus madeavailable to philosophers of set theory
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/pra19851134
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,974
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Stephen Pollard (1992). Choice Again. Philosophical Studies 66 (3):285 - 296.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Thomas Forster (2008). The Iterative Conception of Set. Review of Symbolic Logic 1 (1):97-110.
Øystein Linnebo, Plural Quantification. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
M. D. Potter (1993). Iterative Set Theory. Philosophical Quarterly 44 (171):178-193.
Eric Steinhart (2002). Logically Possible Machines. Minds and Machines 12 (2):259-280.
George Boolos (1971). The Iterative Conception of Set. Journal of Philosophy 68 (8):215-231.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

12 ( #200,933 of 1,725,866 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #166,958 of 1,725,866 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.