COREC Model Information: Can Patients Read What COREC Wants Us to Give Them?

, &
Research Ethics 3 (1):22-23 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

For a patient to make an informed decision about participation in research, it is fundamental that they can understand what is involved. COREC has produced a model information sheet and consent form that researchers are encouraged and sometimes forced to use by LRECs. By applying readability statistics to these documents we have shown that the majority of the UK population would not be able to read this proposed text.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/174701610700300109

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Truth-telling and patient diagnoses.R. J. Sullivan - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (3):192-197.
Judgments about moral responsibility and determinism in patients with behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia: Still compatibilists.Florian Cova, Maxime Bertoux, Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde & Bruno Dubois - 2012 - Consciousness and Cognition 21 (2):851-864.
Personalized Disclosure by Information-on-Demand: Attending to Patients' Needs in the Informed Consent Process.Gil Siegal, Richard J. Bonnie & Paul S. Appelbaum - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (2):359-367.
The process of informed consent for urgent abdominal surgery.R. Kay - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (3):157-161.
Medical studies with 'no material ethical issues' - an unhelpful, confusing and potentially unethical suggestion.S. M. Yentis & A. J. Dawson - 2006 - Clinical Ethics 1 (4):234-236.
Informed consent and quality of available information.Christian Munthe - manuscript
Applying a Sociolinguistic Model to the Analysis of Informed Consent Documents.José Granero-Molina, Cayetano Fernández-Sola & Gabriel Aguilera-Manrique - 2009 - Nursing Ethics 16 (6):797-812.
User‐driven health care – answering multidimensional information needs in individual patients utilizing post–EBM approaches: a conceptual model.Rakesh Biswas, Carmel M. Martin, Joachim Sturmberg, Ravi Shanker, Shashikiran Umakanth, Shiv Shanker & A. S. Kasturi - 2008 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (5):742-749.
User‐driven health care: answering multidimensional information needs in individual patients utilizing post–EBM approaches: an operational model.Rakesh Biswas, Jayanthy Maniam, Edwin Wen Huo Lee, Premalatha Gopal, Shashikiran Umakanth, Sumit Dahiya & Sayeed Ahmed - 2008 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (5):750-760.
Do not resuscitate decisions: discussions with patients.S. G. Schade & H. Muslin - 1989 - Journal of Medical Ethics 15 (4):186-190.
Mental representation from the bottom up.Dan Lloyd - 1987 - Synthese 70 (January):23-78.
Health professionals' attitude towards information disclosure to cancer patients in China.Zeng Tieying, Huang Haishan, Zhao Meizhen, Li Yan & Fang Pengqian - 2011 - Nursing Ethics 18 (3):356-363.
Can “Giving Preference to My Patients” be Explained as a Role Related Duty in Public Health Care Systems?Søren Holm - 2011 - Health Care Analysis 19 (1):89-97.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
11 (#1,143,633)

6 months
4 (#798,558)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references