David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):461-487 (2008)
In our target article, we proposed that addiction could be envisioned as misperformance of a decision-making machinery described by two systems (deliberative and habit systems). Several commentators have argued that Pavlovian learning also produces actions. We agree and note that Pavlovian action-selection will provide several additional vulnerabilities. Several commentators have suggested that addiction arises from sociological parameters. We note in our response how sociological effects can change decision-making variables to provide additional vulnerabilities. Commentators generally have agreed that our theory provides a framework within which to site addiction and treatment, but additional work will be needed to determine whether our taxonomy will help identify and treat subpopulations within the addicted community
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
George Ainslie (2001). Breakdown of Will. Cambridge University Press.
Chrisoula Andreou (2005). Going From Bad (Or Not so Bad) to Worse: On Harmful Addictions and Habits. American Philosophical Quarterly 42 (4):323 - 331.
M. Ben-Ari (2005). Just a Theory: Exploring the Nature of Science. Prometheus Books.
R. L. Buckner & D. C. Carroll (2007). Self-Projection and the Brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11 (2):49-57.
Allen Newell (1990). Unified Theories of Cognition. Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Antonio Rangel (2011). How Does the Brain Make Economic Decisions? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15 (3):95-96.
Similar books and articles
Roselie McDevitt, Catherine Giapponi & Cheryl Tromley (2007). A Model of Ethical Decision Making: The Integration of Process and Content. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 73 (2):219 - 229.
A. M. Viens (2007). Addiction, Responsibility and Moral Psychology. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (1):17 – 19.
Clare M. Pennino (2002). Is Decision Style Related to Moral Development Among Managers in the U.S.? Journal of Business Ethics 41 (4):337 - 347.
Bennett Foddy (2011). Addicted to Food, Hungry for Drugs. Neuroethics 4 (2):79-89.
Helen Keane (2004). Disorders of Desire: Addiction and Problems of Intimacy. [REVIEW] Journal of Medical Humanities 25 (3):189-204.
Andrew James Goudie, Matt Field & Jon Cole (2008). Different Vulnerabilities for Addiction May Contribute to the Same Phenomena and Some Additional Interactions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):445-446.
George Ainslie (2008). Vulnerabilities to Addiction Must Have Their Impact Through the Common Currency of Discounted Reward. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):438-439.
A. David Redish, Steve Jensen & Adam Johnson (2008). A Unified Framework for Addiction: Vulnerabilities in the Decision Process. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):415-437.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #177,741 of 1,410,137 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,743 of 1,410,137 )
How can I increase my downloads?