David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
AI and Society 13 (3):218-234 (1999)
In man-machine communication, there is a relationship between what may be described as tacit (human) and explicit (machine) knowledge. The tacit lies in practice and the explicit in the formulation of the processes and content of this practice. However, when a human communicates with another human face to face, we may describe them as communicating aspects of the tacit and explicit dimension of their knowledge, i.e. the expression and its background of meaning for the particular situation. When this is unsuccessful in being communicated, some mediator (not necessarily a third person) is needed to provide the bridge for the particular discrepant aspects of the tacit and explicit dimensions to meet. This is achieved by making the tacit nature of the discrepancy in the communication explicit to both participants such that they both understand the background to their discrepancy. Once they become aware, it is possible for them to begin to resolve it
|Keywords||Culture Knowledge transfer Mediation Negotiation Propositional knowledge Tacit knowledge|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky (eds.) (1982). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press.
Michael Polanyi (1967). The Tacit Dimension. London, Routledge & K. Paul.
A. L. Kroeber, Clyde Kluckhohn, Wayne Untereiner & Alfred G. Meyer (1954). Culture; A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions. Journal of Philosophy 51 (19):559-563.
Felix Rauner, Lauge Rasmussen & J. Martin Corbett (1988). The Social Shaping of Technology and Work: Human Centred CIM Systems. [REVIEW] AI and Society 2 (1):47-61.
Morton Deutsch (2011). Interdependence and Psychological Orientation. In Peter T. Coleman (ed.), Conflict, Interdependence, and Justice. Springer 247--271.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Harry Collins (2011). Analysing Tacit Knowledge. Tradition and Discovery 38 (1):38-42.
Stephen Turner (2012). Making the Tacit Explicit. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 42 (4):385-402.
Stephen G. Henry (2011). A Clinical Perspective on Tacit Knowledge and Its Varieties. Tradition and Discovery 38 (1):13-17.
Charles Lowney (2011). Ineffable, Tacit, Explicable and Explicit. Tradition and Discovery 38 (1):18-37.
Yu Zhenhua (2012). Polanyi and Wittgenstein on Doubt. International Philosophical Quarterly 52 (4):439-453.
Peeter Torop (2012). Semiotics of Mediation. Sign Systems Studies 40 (3-4):547-555.
Dale Cannon (2002). Construing Polanyi's Tacit Knowing as Knowing by Acquaintance Rather Than Knowing by Representation. Tradition and Discovery 29 (2):26-43.
Jennifer M. Gurd, Gereon R. Fink & John C. Marshall (2002). Tacit Symmetry Detection and Explicit Symmetry Processing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):409-409.
Lucio Biggiero, Organizations as Cognitive Systems is Knowledge an Emergent Property of Information Networks?
Ronald L. Hall (1997). The Primacy Of The Explicit. Tradition and Discovery 24 (2):29-39.
Jon Cogburn (2004). Inferentialism and Tacit Knowledge. Behavior and Philosophy 32 (2):503 - 524.
Hsin-I. Liu (2007). How Is Communication Possible? The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 6:51-56.
Auli Toom (2012). Considering the Artistry and Epistemology of Tacit Knowledge and Knowing. Educational Theory 62 (6):621-640.
Andrea Pozzali (2007). Tacit Knowledge, Implicit Learning and Scientific Reasoning. Mind and Society 7 (2):227-237.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads8 ( #367,542 of 1,789,832 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #420,676 of 1,789,832 )
How can I increase my downloads?