Equivalents of Mingle and positive paradox
Studia Logica 77 (1):117 - 128 (2004)
| Abstract | Relevant logic is a proper subset of classical logic. It does not include among its theorems any ofpositive paradox A (B A). | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesBranden Fitelson & James Hawthorne (2010). How Bayesian Confirmation Theory Handles the Paradox of the Ravens. In Ellery Eells & James Fetzer (eds.), The Place of Probability in Science. Springer.
Gregor Damschen (2011). Questioning Gödel's Ontological Proof: Is Truth Positive? European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):161-169.
Susan Rogerson (2007). Natural Deduction and Curry's Paradox. Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (2):155 - 179.
Michael Cholbi (2009). Moore's Paradox and Moral Motivation. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (5):495-510.
Jeremy Gwiazda (2006). The Train Paradox. Philosophia 34 (4):437-438.
Leif Eriksen (1989). Confirmation, Paradox, and Logic. Philosophy of Science 56 (4):681-687.
Alexej P. Pynko (2000). Subprevarieties Versus Extensions. Application to the Logic of Paradox. Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (2):756-766.
Richard Otte (1985). Probabilistic Causality and Simpson's Paradox. Philosophy of Science 52 (1):110-125.
Norihiro Kamide (2002). Substructural Logics with Mingle. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11 (2):227-249.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads3 ( #201,781 of 549,014 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
