Quine in Perspective

Journal of Philosophy 69 (1):5 (1972)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Proper understanding of Quine's texts is a necessary prerequisite for evaluating his arguments. Quine is a scientist. [AL 1/29/2004]

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,705

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Review of Gochet, Ascent to Truth. [REVIEW]H. G. Callaway - 1988 - Dialectica, Vol. 42, No. 1, 1988, Pp. 45-58 42 (No. 1):45-58.
Skeptizismus, Naturalismus und Quine.Sven Bernecker - 2003 - Philosophisches Jahrbuch 110 (1):46-58.
Empirical equivalence in the Quine-Carnap debate.Eric J. Loomis - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):499–508.
Quine and pragmatism.Heikki J. Koskinen & Sami Pihlström - 2006 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (3):309-346.
From within and from without. Two perspectives on analytic sentences.Olaf L. Müller - 2002 - In Wolfram Hinzen & Hans Rott (eds.), Belief and meaning: Essays at the interface. Deutsche Bibliothek der Wissenschaften.
Is Quine a Verificationist?Panu Raatikainen - 2003 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (3):399-409.
Quine and Davidson: Two naturalized epistemologists.Roger F. Gibson - 1994 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 37 (4):449 – 463.
Quine's Argument from Despair.Sander Verhaegh - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (1):150-173.
Quine.Peter Hylton - 2007 - London: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
38 (#429,338)

6 months
6 (#574,672)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?