David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sociological Theory 23 (4):368-385 (2005)
This article proposes that Goffman's "Frame Analysis" can be interpreted as a step toward unpacking the idea of context. His analysis implies a recursive model involving frames within frames. The key problem is that neither Goffman nor anyone else has clearly defined what is meant by a frame. I propose that it can be represented by a word, phrase, or proposition. A subjective context can be represented as an assembly of these items, joined together by operators such as and, since, if, not, and then. Furthermore, this model can be combined with the recursive levels of mutual awareness in earlier approaches to consensus. The combination would represent the inter subjective context: it can be used to find the minimum amount of background that would allow consensual interpretations of discourse. It could also construct a chain that links discourse to the institutional level, the micro-macro pathway from word and gesture to social structure. Goffman hinted that mathematical notation might be used to represent a frame assembly. By adding levels of awareness to such notation, it could represent social facts. Because the use of vernacular words rather than concepts is a problem in social science, Goffman's approach has a general as well as a particular significance
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Thomas Nagel (1979/2012). Mortal Questions. Cambridge University Press.
J. L. Austin (1975). How to Do Things with Words. Clarendon Press.
D. Sperber & D. Wilson (1995). Relevance. Blackwell.
Kenneth James Williams Craik (1967). The Nature of Explanation. Cambridge, Cambridge U.P..
Herbert H. Clark & Catherine R. Marshall (1981). Definite Reference and Mutual Knowledge In Aravind K. Joshi, Bonnie L. Webber, and Ivan A. Sag, Editors. In A. Joshi, Bruce H. Weber & Ivan A. Sag (eds.), Elements of Discourse Understanding. Cambridge University Press
Citations of this work BETA
Guichun Guo (2010). The Boundaries of Context and Their Significance. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (3):449-460.
Similar books and articles
Anne Warfield Rawls (1987). The Interaction Order Sui Generis: Goffman's Contribution to Social Theory. Sociological Theory 5 (2):136-149.
José Angel García Landa, Goffman: La realidad como expectativa autocumplida y el teatro de la interioridad (Goffman: Reality as self-fulfilling expectation and the theatre of interiority).
Jason Ditton (ed.) (1980). The View From Goffman. St. Martin's Press.
Ian Craib (1978). Erving Goffman: Frame Analysis. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 8 (1):79-86.
Mark Sprevak (2005). The Frame Problem and the Treatment of Prediction. In L. Magnani & R. Dossena (eds.), Computing, Philosophy and Cognition. 4--349.
Xiang Chen (2005). Transforming Temporal Knowledge: Conceptual Change Between Event Concepts. Perspectives on Science 13 (1):49-73.
Michael Wheeler (2008). Cognition in Context: Phenomenology, Situated Robotics and the Frame Problem. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (3):323 – 349.
Beihai Zhou (1999). Grafted Frames and S1-Completeness. Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (3):1324-1338.
W. F. G. Haselager & J. F. H. Van Rappard (1998). Connectionism, Systematicity, and the Frame Problem. Minds and Machines 8 (2):161-179.
Thomas J. Scheff (2007). A Concept of Social Integration. Philosophical Psychology 20 (5):579 – 593.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads209 ( #12,786 of 1,793,012 )
Recent downloads (6 months)72 ( #8,727 of 1,793,012 )
How can I increase my downloads?