David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Explorations 10 (1):69 – 76 (2007)
I agree with much of Habermas's article ?The Language Game of Responsible Agency and the Problem of Free Will,? but concentrate on disagreements. (i) He is wrong to think the language game of neuroscience is somehow at odds with the language game of rational intentionality. I argue that they give different levels of description of the same system. He also has too narrow a conception of contemporary neurobiological research. (ii) He is mistaken in thinking there is a ?performative contradiction? in engaging in research that presupposes free will in order to disprove free will. (iii) His ?epistemic dualism? is irrelevant to the issue. (iv) He has some misconceptions about the world in general, especially about ?downward causation.? He seems to think that the physical world is deterministic. It is not. Quantum indeterminacy pervades the entire universe. We have the illusion of determinism because in some systems the quantum indeterminacies cancel out at the macro level. Is the brain a deterministic system? Right now we do not know
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
C. BeCchio, M. Adenzato & B. Bara (2006). How the Brain Understands Intention: Different Neural Circuits Identify the Componential Features of Motor and Prior Intentions. Consciousness and Cognition 15 (1):64-74.
Citations of this work BETA
Abigail Klassen (2013). Beauvoir, the Scandal of Science, and Skepticism as Method. Hypatia 28 (4):835-851.
Similar books and articles
N. Gangopadhyay & L. Schilbach (2011). Seeing Minds: A Neurophilosophical Investigation of the Role of Perception-Action Coupling in Social Perception. Social Neuroscience.
E. J. Lowe (1982). Intentionality and Intuition: A Reply to Davies. Analysis 42 (March):85.
John R. Searle (1984). Intentionality and its Place in Nature. Synthese 38 (October):87-100.
John Searle (1983). Intentionality. Oxford University Press.
Chris Kaposy (2009). Will Neuroscientific Discoveries About Free Will and Selfhood Change Our Ethical Practices? Neuroethics 2 (1):51-59.
Jurgen Habermas (2011). A Reply to My Critics. In James Gordon Finlayson & Fabian Freyenhagen (eds.), Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political. Rouledge
Michael G. Dyer (1990). Intentionality and Computationalism: Minds, Machines, Searle and Harnad. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 2:303-19.
Timothy Schroeder (2007). Reflection, Reason, and Free Will. Philosophical Explorations 10 (1):77 – 84.
Sally K. Severino (2012). Free Will According to John Duns Scotus and Neuroscience. Zygon 47 (1):156-174.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads282 ( #7,084 of 1,790,294 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #169,251 of 1,790,294 )
How can I increase my downloads?