James Gordon Finlayson & Fabian Freyenhagen (eds.)
Routledge (2010)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Habermas and Rawls are two heavyweights of social and political philosophy, and they are undoubtedly the two most written about authors in this field. However, there has not been much informed and interesting work on the points of intersection between their projects, partly because their work comes from different traditions—roughly the European tradition of social and political theory and the Anglo-American analytic tradition of political philosophy. In this volume, contributors re-examine the Habermas-Rawls dispute with an eye toward the ways in which the dispute can cast light on current controversies about political philosophy more broadly. Moreover, the volume will cover a number of other salient issues on which Habermas and Rawls have interesting and divergent views, such as the political role of religion and international justice.
|
Keywords | Habermas Rawls Political Liberalism Justification |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 2011, 2012, 2013 |
Buy this book | $47.45 new Amazon page |
Call number | B3258.H324.H315 2011 |
ISBN(s) | 9780415836555 9780203723869 0415836557 9780415876865 0415876869 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options

Introduction : The Habermas Rawls Dispute : Analysis and Re-Evaluation.James Gordon Finlayson & Fabian Freyenhagen
Procedure in Substance and Substance in Procedure : Reframing the Habermas-Rawls Debate.James Gledhill
Reconciliation Through the Public Reason : Remarks on John Rawls's Political Liberalism.Jurgen Habermas
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
World Crisis and Underdevelopment: A Critical Theory of Poverty, Agency, and Coercion.David Ingram - 2017 - Cambridge University Press.
What Difference Can It Make: Why Write Books on Global Justice in the First Place?Mathias Risse - 2016 - Journal of International Political Theory 12 (2):96-117.
Normative Engagement Across Difference: Pragmatism, Dialogic Inclusion, and Social Practices.Clayton Chin - 2018 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 44 (3):302-325.
The Twilight of the Liberal Social Contract? On the Reception of Rawlsian Political Liberalism.Enzo Rossi - forthcoming - In Kelly Becker & Iain Thomson (eds.), The Cambridge History of Philosophy, 1945–2015. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Justification and Application: The Revival of the Rawls–Habermas Debate.Jørgen Pedersen - 2012 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (3):399-432.
View all 13 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Introduction : The Habermas Rawls Dispute : Analysis and Re-Evaluation.James Gordon Finlayson & Fabian Freyenhagen - 2011 - In James Gordon Finlayson & Fabian Freyenhagen (eds.), Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political. Rouledge.
Rawls and Habermas on the Place of Religion in the Political Domain.Catherine Audard - 2011 - In James Gordon Finlayson & Fabian Freyenhagen (eds.), Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political. Rouledge.
Reconciliation Through the Public Reason : Remarks on John Rawls's Political Liberalism.Jurgen Habermas - 2011 - In James Gordon Finlayson & Fabian Freyenhagen (eds.), Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political. Rouledge.
The Justification of Justice : Rawls and Habermas in Dialogue.Rainer Forst - 2011 - In James Gordon Finlayson & Fabian Freyenhagen (eds.), Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political. Rouledge.
Justification and Application: The Revival of the Rawls–Habermas Debate.Jørgen Pedersen - 2012 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (3):399-432.
Conflicts of Value and the Political Ideal of Citizenship: A Defense of Political Constructivism.John R. Wright - 2002 - Social Philosophy Today 18:167-181.
Two Models of Human Rights : Extending the Rawls-Habermas Debate.Jeffrey Flynn - 2011 - In James Gordon Finlayson & Fabian Freyenhagen (eds.), Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political. Rouledge.
Beyond Overlapping Consensus : Rawls and Habermas on the Limits of Cosmopolitanism.Jim Bohman - 2011 - In James Gordon Finlayson & Fabian Freyenhagen (eds.), Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political. Rouledge.
Habermas, Rawls, and Moral Impartiality.Chris McMahon - 2011 - In James Gordon Finlayson & Fabian Freyenhagen (eds.), Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political. Rouledge.
Reasonable Versus True, or, The Morality of World Views.Jurgen Habermas - 2011 - In James Gordon Finlayson & Fabian Freyenhagen (eds.), Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political. Rouledge.
A Reply to My Critics.Jurgen Habermas - 2011 - In James Gordon Finlayson & Fabian Freyenhagen (eds.), Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political. Rouledge.
Procedure in Substance and Substance in Procedure : Reframing the Habermas-Rawls Debate.James Gledhill - 2011 - In James Gordon Finlayson & Fabian Freyenhagen (eds.), Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political. Rouledge.
Where the Right Gets In. On Rawl's Criticism of Habermas's Conception of Legitimacy.Gordon Finlayson - unknown
The Habermas-Rawls Dispute Redivivus.James Gordon Finlayson - 2007 - Politics and Ethics Review 3 (1):144-162.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2010-07-14
Total views
58 ( #196,428 of 2,507,901 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,715 of 2,507,901 )
2010-07-14
Total views
58 ( #196,428 of 2,507,901 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,715 of 2,507,901 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads