On the distorted structure of Russian guilt

Studies in East European Thought 74 (4):585-592 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This commentary offers a concise description of the structure revealed in the discourse about Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, but that also serves as a condition of the possibility for such events to happen. The points of view that this structure provides are relational, interdependent, and mutually constructed, and they are labeled as the Citizens, the Authorities, and the People. All these positions are structured in such a way that provides their subjects with a source of enjoyment. The positions can be described as follows: fetishism of the Citizens, who almost invent their guilt without being held responsible; sadism of the Authorities, whose urge to make more and more atrocious decisions demand to repeatedly dismiss or shift the blame; masochism of the People, who accept their responsibility for anything without having a clear idea about the contents of decisions that were made in their name. In regards to communal guilt, it is crucial to take this level of enjoyment into account, in order to refuse sinking into emotions and avoiding using the language of guilt and shame. However, to simply switch to the language of understanding and responsibility instead is not enough. The language we need to seek is the one that would allow us to directly address the inadequacy of this distorted political arrangement—not some kind of metalanguage, but, on the contrary, a common language.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is Guilt a Feeling? An Analysis of Guilt in Existential Philosophy.Hye Young Kim - 2017 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 9 (3):230-240.
Critical Realism and the Metaphysics of Justice.Alan Norrie - 2016 - Journal of Critical Realism 15 (4):391-408.
La culpabilité. [REVIEW]D. G. R. - 1958 - Review of Metaphysics 12 (1):149-149.
Guilt Without Perceived Wrongdoing.Michael Zhao - 2020 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 48 (3):285-314.
Guilt-free morality.Gilbert Harman - 2009 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 4:203-14.
Collective guilt and collective guilt feelings.Margaret Gilbert - 2002 - The Journal of Ethics 6 (2):115-143.
Collective Guilt and Collective Punishment.George P. Fletcher - 2004 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 5 (1):163-178.
Wittgenstein, Guilt And Western Buddhism.Robert Vinten - 2020 - Contemporary Buddhism 21 (2):284-303.
Guilt and sin in traditional China.Wolfram Eberhard - 1967 - Berkeley,: University of California Press.
Guilt by association?Michael Deem & Grant Ramsey - 2016 - Philosophical Psychology 29 (4):570-585.
Collective Guilt Feelings.Björn Petersson - 2020 - In Saba Bazargan-Forward & Deborah Perron Tollefsen (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Collective Responsibility. Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-10

Downloads
14 (#997,421)

6 months
7 (#441,920)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Responsibility for Justice.Iris Marion Young - 2011 - , US: Oxford University Press USA.

Add more references