Hume and Kant. Interpretation and Discussion [Book Review]

Philosophy and History 18 (1):3-3 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Manfred Kuehn: Kant - A Biography. [REVIEW]Thomas Sturm - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (216):476-479.
Kant's Conception of Virtue.Lara Denis - 2006 - In Paul Guyer (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Kant's model of causality: Causal powers, laws, and Kant's reply to Hume.Eric Watkins - 2004 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (4):449-488.
Hume and Humeans on Practical Reason.David Phillips - 2005 - Hume Studies 31 (2):347-378.
Is Hume's Use of Evidence as Bad as Norton Says It Is?S. K. Wertz - 1982 - Philosophical Topics 13 (9999):79-86.
Does Kant Refute Hume’s Derivation of the Concept of Cause?Gregg Osborne - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32:293-318.
Categorical requirements: Kant and Hume on the idea of duty.David Wiggins - 1995 - In Rosalind Hursthouse, Gavin Lawrence & Warren Quinn (eds.), Virtues and Reasons: Philippa Foot and Moral Theory: Essays in Honour of Philippa Foot. Oxford: Clarendon Press. pp. 297-330.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-21

Downloads
22 (#709,861)

6 months
1 (#1,472,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references