David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Indian Philosophy 36 (2):297-317 (2008)
Dependent-origination, possibly the most fundamental Buddhist philosophical principle, is generally understood as a description of all that exists. Mental as well as physical phenomena are believed to come into being only in relation to, and conditioned by, other phenomena. This paper argues that such an understanding of pratītya-samutpāda is mistaken with regard to the earlier meanings of the concept. Rather than relating to all that exists, dependent-origination related originally only to processes of mental conditioning. It was an analysis of the self, not of reality, embedded in the Upaniṣadic search for the ātman. The teaching also possessed important ontological implications regarding the nature of the relation between consciousness and reality. These implications suggest that rather than things being conditioned by other things, they are actually conditioned by consciousness.
|Keywords||Dependent-origination pratītya-samutpāda paṭiccasamuppāda Early Buddhism Conditionality Causality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alex Wayman (1980). Dependent Origination-the Indo-Tibetan Tradition. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 7 (4):275-300.
Charles Muller, Innate Enlightenment and No-Thought: A Response to the Critical Buddhist Position on Zen.
Bart Dessein (2011). Time, Temporality, and the Characteristic Marks of the Conditioned: Sarvāstivāda and Madhyamaka Buddhist Interpretations. Asian Philosophy 21 (4):341 - 360.
Adam Scarfe (2006). Hegelian 'Absolute Idealism' with Yogācāra Buddhism on Consciousness, Concept ( Begriff ), and Co-Dependent Origination ( Pratītyasamutpāda ). Contemporary Buddhism 7 (1):47-73.
Ram Lakhan Pandey Vimal (2009). Dependent Co-Origination and Inherent Existence: Dual-Aspect Framework. Vision Research Institute: Living Vision and Consciousness Research 1 (2).
Claire Ortiz Hill (2010). On Fundamental Differences Between Dependent and Independent Meanings. Axiomathes 20 (2-3):313-332.
Michael Kurak (2003). The Relevance of the Buddhist Theory of Dependent Co-Origination to Cognitive Science. Brain and Mind 4 (3):341-351.
Jennifer Mcmahon Railey (1997). Dependent Origination and the Dual-Nature of the Japanese Aesthetic. Asian Philosophy 7 (2):123 – 132.
Ewing Chinn (2001). Nāgārjuna's Fundamental Doctrine of Pratītyasamutpāda. Philosophy East and West 51 (1):54-72.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #55,386 of 1,006,257 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,735 of 1,006,257 )
How can I increase my downloads?