The relationship between corporate social performance, and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: An empirical examination [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 17 (2):195-204 (1998)
|Abstract||The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between the corporate social performance of an organization and three variables: the size of the organization, the financial performance of the organization, and the environmental performance of the organization. By empirically testing data from 1987 to 1992, the results of the study show that a firm's corporate social performance is indeed impacted by the size of the firm, the level of profitability of the firm, and the amount of pollution emissions released by the firm.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Christine M. Riordan, Robert D. Gatewood & JodiBarnes Bill (1997). Corporate Image: Employee Reactions and Implications for Managing Corporate Social Performance. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 16 (4):401-412.
William Q. Judge (1994). Correlates of Organizational Effectiveness: A Multilevel Analysis of a Multidimensional Outcome. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 13 (1):1 - 10.
Khaled Elsayed (2006). Reexamining the Expected Effect of Available Resources and Firm Size on Firm Environmental Orientation: An Empirical Study of UK Firms. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 65 (3):297 - 308.
Geoff Moore (2001). Corporate Social and Financial Performance: An Investigation in the U.K. Supermarket Industry. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 34 (3-4):299 - 315.
W. Gary Simpson & Theodor Kohers (2002). The Link Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance: Evidence From the Banking Industry. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 35 (2):97 - 109.
Irene Goll & Abdul A. Rasheed (2004). The Moderating Effect of Environmental Munificence and Dynamism on the Relationship Between Discretionary Social Responsibility and Firm Performance. Journal of Business Ethics 49 (1):41-54.
A. Salama, K. Anderson & J. S. Toms (2011). Does Community and Environmental Responsibility Affect Firm Risk? Evidence From UK Panel Data 1994–2006. Business Ethics 20 (2):192-204.
Morgan P. Miles & Jeffrey G. Covin (2000). Environmental Marketing: A Source of Reputational, Competitive, and Financial Advantage. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 23 (3):299 - 311.
Bruce Seifert, Sara A. Morris & Barbara R. Bartkus (2003). Comparing Big Givers and Small Givers: Financial Correlates of Corporate Philanthropy. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 45 (3):195 - 211.
Marc Orlitzky (2001). Does Firm Size Comfound the Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Firm Financial Performance? Journal of Business Ethics 33 (2):167 - 180.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads41 ( #32,748 of 739,369 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,369 )
How can I increase my downloads?