Metaphilosophy 17 (4):266-288 (1986)
|Abstract||The previous chapter provided not only concrete evidence that Kant's System is based on the principle of perspective [II.2-3], but also a general outline of its perspectival structure [II.4]. The task this sets for the interpreter is to establish in greater detail the extent to which the System actually does unfold according to this pattern. This will be undertaken primarily in Parts Two and Three. But before concluding Part One, it will be helpful to examine in more detail the logical structure of the relationships between the various parts of Kant's System, and how they fit together to compose what we have called Kant's 'Copernican Perspective'|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
T. Achourioti & M. van Lambalgen (forthcoming). A Formalisation of Kant's Transcendental Logic. Review of Symbolic Logic.
Stephen Palmquist (1989). Immanuel Kant: A Christian Philosopher? Faith and Philosophy 6 (1):65-75.
Gaven Kerr (2011). Kant's Transcendental Idealism. International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (2):195-222.
Peter Woelert (2007). Kant's Hands, Spatial Orientation, and the Copernican Turn. Continental Philosophy Review 40 (2):139-150.
Stephen R. Palmquist (1989). Kant's Critique of Mysticism. Philosophy and Theology 3 (4):355-383.
Justin Le Saux, Darwin Verses Kant and Instead of Supposing the Universe Rotates Around the Earth, Trying To.
Ty D. Camp, From the Schematic to the Symbolic: The Radical Possibilities of the Imagination in Kant's Third Critique.
Paul Rusnock (2011). Kant and Bolzano on Logical Form. Kant-Studien 102 (4):477-491.
Dennis Schulting (2009). Kant's Copernican Analogy: Beyond the Non-Specific Reading. Studi Kantiani 22:39-65.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads7 ( #142,326 of 722,860 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,860 )
How can I increase my downloads?