Graduate studies at Western
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 109 (1pt1):61-82 (2009)
|Abstract||Frege holds the distinction between complete (saturated) and incomplete (unsaturated) things to be a basic distinction of logic. Many disagree. In this paper I will argue that one can defend Frege's distinction against criticism if one takes, inspired by Frege, a wh -question to be the paradigm incomplete expression.|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (1986). On Frege's Two Notions of Sense. History and Philosophy of Logic 7 (1):31-41.
Mary Tiles (1980). Kant, Wittgenstein and the Limits of Logic. History and Philosophy of Logic 1 (1-2):151-170.
Jan Wolenński (1997). Hans Sluga (Ed.), The Philosophy of Frege. A Four-Volume Collection of Scholarly Articles on All Aspects of Frege's Philosophy, Vol.1: General Assessments and Historical Accounts of Frege's Philosophy, Vol.2: Logic and Foundations of Mathematics in Frege's Philosophy, Vol.3: Meaning and Ontology in Frege's Philosophy, Vol.4: Sense and Reference in Frege's Philosophy. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 46 (3):407-410.
Jamie Tappenden (2008). A Primer on Ernst Abbe for Frege Readers. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38 (S1):31-118.
Michael David Resnik (1965). Frege's Theory of Incomplete Entities. Philosophy of Science 32 (3/4):329-341.
Charles Travis (2008). To Represent as So. In David K. Levy & Edoardo Zamuner (eds.), Wittgenstein's Enduring Arguments. Routledge.
Mark Textor (2010). Frege's Concept Paradox and the Mirroring Principle. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):126-148.
Gideon Makin (2010). Frege's Distinction Between Sense and Reference. Philosophy Compass 5 (2):147-163.
Added to index2009-03-24
Total downloads56 ( #21,366 of 739,317 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,317 )
How can I increase my downloads?