De Ontologie van den Paradox

Dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since the dawn of philosophy, the paradoxical interconnection between the continuous and the discrete plays a central rôle in attempts to understand the ontology of the world, while defying all attempts at consistent formulation. I investigate the relation between (classical) logic and concepts of “space” and “time” in physical and metaphysical theories, starting with the Greeks. An important part of my research consists in exploring the strong connections between paradoxes as they appear and are dealt with in ancient philosophy, and their re-appearance in early modern natural philosophy, as well as in the foundations of contemporary science and mathematics. The way paradoxes are dealt with sheds light on a theory’s hidden metaphysical assumptions, especially with respect to matter, space, time and causation, it defines its ontological signature. This conclusion led me to the in-depth study of early modern natural philosophy, the origin of natural science, especially the influences ancient thinkers had on the new conceptions of space, time and causation developed by Newton, Huygens and Leibniz.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

"I am SO Humble!": On the Paradoxes of Humility.Brian Robinson - 2021 - In Mark Alfano, Michael Patrick Lynch & Alessandra Tanesini (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Humility. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 26-35.
Newman’s Skeptical Paradox.Joe Milburn - 2020 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 94 (1):105-123.
Intuition and Russell´s Paradox.Margaret Cuonzo - 2001 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 5 (1-2):73–86.
Freges Begrifflehre, ohne ihr angebliches Paradox.A. Kemmerling - 2004 - In Mark Siebel & Mark Textor (eds.), Semantik Und Ontologie. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag. pp. 39--62.
From Paradoxicality to Paradox.Ming Hsiung - forthcoming - Erkenntnis:1-25.
The liar: What paradox? [REVIEW]Avrum Stroll - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (1):63-75.
Intuition and Russell´s Paradox.Margaret Cuonzo - 2001 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 5 (1-2):73–86.
Paradoxical propositions.Graham Priest - 2018 - Philosophical Issues 28 (1):300-307.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-08-21

Downloads
840 (#17,840)

6 months
567 (#2,520)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Karin Verelst
Vrije Universiteit Brussel

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology.Rudolf Carnap - 2011 - In Robert B. Talisse & Scott F. Aikin (eds.), The Pragmatism Reader: From Peirce Through the Present. Princeton University Press. pp. 249-264.
A useful four-valued logic.N. D. Belnap - 1977 - In J. M. Dunn & G. Epstein (eds.), Modern Uses of Multiple-Valued Logic. D. Reidel.
The Problem of the Many.Peter Unger - 1980 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5 (1):411-468.

View all 44 references / Add more references