Paradoxical propositions

Philosophical Issues 28 (1):300-307 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper concerns two paradoxes involving propositions. The first is Russell's paradox from Appendix B of The Principles of Mathematics, a version of which was later given by Myhill. The second is a paradox in the framework of possible worlds, given by Kaplan. This paper shows a number of things about these paradoxes. First, we will see that, though the Russell/myhill paradox and the Kaplan paradox might appear somewhat different, they are really just variants of the same phenomenon. Though they do this in different ways, the core of each paradox is to use the notion of a proposition to construct a function, f, from the power set of some set into the set itself. Next we will see how this paradox fits into the Inclosure Schema. Finally, I will provide a model of the paradox in question, showing its results to be non‐trivial, though inconsistent.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The law of non‐contradiction and chinese philosophy.Xinyan Jiang - 1992 - History and Philosophy of Logic 13 (1):1-14.
Symmetry and Paradox.Stephen Read - 2006 - History and Philosophy of Logic 27 (4):307-318.
Self-referential propositions.Bruno Whittle - 2017 - Synthese 194 (12):5023-5037.
Propositions as interpreted abstracta.Thomas Hodgson - 2022 - In Chris Tillman & Adam Murray (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Propositions. Routledge. pp. 256-267.
Wittgenstein on Nonsignificant Propositions.Puqun Li - 2001 - Dissertation, University of Ottawa (Canada)
Modern Philosophy.Jonathan Harrison - 2009 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 65:71-92.
On fineness of grain.Jeffrey C. King - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (3):763-781.
On cogito propositions.William J. Rapaport - 1976 - Philosophical Studies 29 (1):63-68.
John Mair on Semantic Paradoxes.Miroslav Hanke - 2013 - Studia Neoaristotelica 10 (1):50-87.
The paradox of ineffability.Gäb Sebastian - 2017 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 78 (3):1-12.
Paradoxical hypodoxes.Alexandre Billon - 2019 - Synthese 196 (12):5205-5229.
The Paradoxical Self.William Hirstein & V. S. Ramachandran - 2011 - In Narinder Kapur (ed.), The Paradoxical Brain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 94-109.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-06

Downloads
65 (#251,183)

6 months
4 (#798,550)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Graham Priest
CUNY Graduate Center

Citations of this work

The fixed points of belief and knowledge.Daniela Schuster - forthcoming - Logic Journal of the IGPL.
Myers' paradox.Graham Priest - 2021 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 10 (2):147-154.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Outline of a theory of truth.Saul Kripke - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (19):690-716.
The Principles of Mathematics.Bertrand Russell - 1903 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 11 (4):11-12.
A Problem in Possible Worlds Semantics.David Kaplan - 1995 - In Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Diana Raffman & Nicholas Asher (eds.), Modality, morality, and belief: essays in honor of Ruth Barcan Marcus. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 41-52.
What If? The Exploration of an Idea.Graham Priest - 2017 - Australasian Journal of Logic 14 (1).

View all 7 references / Add more references