Graduate studies at Western
International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (2):201-220 (2010)
|Abstract||Historians and philosophers of science commonly ignore the epistemological disagreement about the theoretical limits of rationality that underlies the disputes over the absoluteness or relationality of time and the true nature of divine freedom in the Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence. Accordingly, I explore both the logical interconnectedness and the deeper philosophical roots of these disputes, with a view to evaluating the contrast in Leibniz’s and Clarke’s underlying notions of the limits of rationality. In tracing this contrast, I attempt to show first that Clarke’s position can be used to demonstrate successfully that Leibniz’s concept of divine freedom, and his use of the Principle of Sufficient Reason to justify it, involves a contradiction. Second, I attempt to demonstrate that the concept of the limits of rationality underlying Clarke’s conception of divine freedom can be successfully defended against Leibniz’s attacks|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Samuel Clarke (1956). The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence: Together with Extracts From Newton's Principia and Opticks. Barnes & Noble.
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz & Samuel Clarke (2007). The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence. In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Late Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell Pub. Ltd..
Albert Ribas (2003). Leibniz' "Discourse on the Natural Theology of the Chinese" and the Leibniz-Clarke Controversy. Philosophy East and West 53 (1):64-86.
Tad M. Schmaltz (2010). Malebranche and Leibniz on the Best of All Possible Worlds. Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (1):28-48.
Albert Ribas (2003). Leibniz'. Philosophy East and West 53 (1).
Jack D. Davidson (2003). Leibniz on the Labyrinth of Freedom. The Leibniz Review 13:19-43.
John T. Roberts (2003). Leibniz on Force and Absolute Motion. Philosophy of Science 70 (3):553-573.
Ori Belkind (2013). Leibniz and Newton on Space. Foundations of Science 18 (3):467-497.
Laurence Carlin (1997). Infinite Accumulations and Pantheistic Implications. The Leibniz Review 7:1-24.
C. L. (1957). The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence. The Review of Metaphysics 10 (4):722-722.
A. Gabbey (2003). Leibniz and Clarke: A Study of Their Correspondence. Philosophical Review 112 (4):570-572.
Ernan McMullin (1956). The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence. Philosophical Studies 6:175-176.
James Collins (1959). The Leibniz.-Clarke Correspondence. The New Scholasticism 33 (1):109-110.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads6 ( #154,793 of 739,319 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,319 )
How can I increase my downloads?