David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
To naturalize religion we must identify what religion is, and what aspects of it we are trying to explain. In this paper religious social institutional behavior is the explanatory target, and an explanatory hypothesis based on shared primate social dominance psychology is given. The argument is that various religious features, including the high status afforded the religious, and the high status afforded to deities, is an expression of this social dominance psychology in a context for which it did not evolve: high density populations made possible by agriculture.
|Keywords||religion social dominance social institution|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Lee A. Kirkpatrick (2004). The Evolutionary Social Psychology of Religious Beliefs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):741-741.
Rui F. Oliveira (1998). Of Fish and Men: A Comparative Approach to Androgens and Social Dominance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):383-384.
Denise Dellarosa Cummins (2000). How the Social Environment Shaped the Evolution of Mind. Synthese 122 (1-2):3 - 28.
James M. Dabbs (1998). Testosterone and the Concept of Dominance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):370-371.
Barbara Applebaum (2001). Raising Awareness of Dominance: Does Recognising Dominance Mean One has to Dismiss the Values of the Dominant Group? Journal of Moral Education 30 (1):55-70.
Mahdi Muhammad Moosa & S. M. Minhaz Ud-Dean (2011). The Role of Dominance Hierarchy in the Evolution of Social Species. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 41 (2):203-208.
Charles T. Snowdon (1998). The Nurture of Nature: Social, Developmental, and Environmental Controls of Aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):384-385.
Valerie J. Grant (1998). Dominance Runs Deep. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):376-377.
Charles Lemert (1999). The Might Have Been and Could Be of Religion in Social Theory. Sociological Theory 17 (3):240-263.
Marcia L. Collaer (1998). Early Organizational Influences and Social Factors: A Need for Further Evaluation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):368-369.
Ninian Smart (1963). Social Anthropology and the Philosophy of Religion. Inquiry 6 (1-4):287-299.
Helmuth Nyborg (2004). Multivariate Modelling of Testosterone-Dominance Associations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):155-159.
Matthew Day (2009). Constructing Religion Without the Social: Durkheim, Latour, and Extended Cognition. Zygon 44 (3):719-737.
Gerald Heard (1931). Social Substance of Religion. New York, Harcourt, Brace & Company.
Added to index2012-08-21
Total downloads270 ( #965 of 1,088,810 )
Recent downloads (6 months)79 ( #384 of 1,088,810 )
How can I increase my downloads?