Gods Above: Naturalizing religion in terms of our shared ape social dominance behavior

Abstract
To naturalize religion we must identify what religion is, and what aspects of it we are trying to explain. In this paper religious social institutional behavior is the explanatory target, and an explanatory hypothesis based on shared primate social dominance psychology is given. The argument is that various religious features, including the high status afforded the religious, and the high status afforded to deities, is an expression of this social dominance psychology in a context for which it did not evolve: high density populations made possible by agriculture.
Keywords religion  social dominance  social institution
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive
External links This entry has no external links. Add one.
Through your library Only published papers are available at libraries
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
James M. Dabbs (1998). Testosterone and the Concept of Dominance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):370-371.
Valerie J. Grant (1998). Dominance Runs Deep. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):376-377.
Gerald Heard (1931). Social Substance of Religion. New York, Harcourt, Brace & Company.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-08-21

Total downloads

270 ( #965 of 1,088,810 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

79 ( #384 of 1,088,810 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.