Value Pluralism and the Problem of Judgment

Political Theory 40 (1):6-31 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay examines the significantly different approaches of John Rawls and Hannah Arendt to the problem of judgment in democratic theory and practice

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Public reason and the normativity of the reasonable.Alessandro Ferrara - 2004 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (5-6):579-596.
Farewell to reason.Paul Feyerabend - 1987 - New York: Verso.
Public Reason and the Hobbesian Dilemma.Shane Courtland - 2007 - Hobbes Studies 20 (1):63-92.
Species pluralism and anti-realism.Marc Ereshefsky - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (1):103-120.
On the Limits of Rights and Representation.Terrence L. Johnson - 2015 - Journal of Religious Ethics 43 (4):697-722.
Public Reason and Cultural Pluralism.James Bohman - 1995 - Political Theory 23 (2):253-279.
Pluralism, Imagination, and Estrangement.Lisa Rivera - 2006 - Philosophical Papers 35 (3):327-365.
The Mutability of Public Reason.Chad Flanders - 2012 - Ratio Juris 25 (2):180-205.
Kant and the Problem of Practical Judgment.Shawn Daniel Kaplan - 2000 - Dissertation, New School for Social Research
Bioethics and Public Reason: A Report on Ethics and Public Discourse in Spain.Adela Cortina - 2009 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18 (3):241.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-30

Downloads
137 (#134,885)

6 months
16 (#156,807)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Linda Zerilli
University of Chicago

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references