Philosophy of Scientific Malpractice

SATS 22 (2):135-148 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper presents current work in philosophy of science in practice that focusses on practices that are detrimental to the production of scientific knowledge. The paper argues that philosophy of scientific malpractice both provides an epistemological complement to research ethics in understanding scientific misconduct and questionable research practices, and provides a new approach to how training in responsible conduct of research can be implemented.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Beyond Trust: Plagiarism and Truth.Bart Penders - 2018 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15 (1):29-32.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-11-11

Downloads
29 (#537,165)

6 months
9 (#438,283)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hanne Andersen
University of Copenhagen

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Rethinking Expertise.Harry Collins & Robert Evans - 2007 - University of Chicago Press.
Experts: Which ones should you trust?Alvin I. Goldman - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1):85-110.
Epistemic dependence.John Hardwig - 1985 - Journal of Philosophy 82 (7):335-349.
The role of trust in knowledge.John Hardwig - 1991 - Journal of Philosophy 88 (12):693-708.

View all 22 references / Add more references