The Democratic Minimum: Is Democracy a Means to Global Justice?

Ethics and International Affairs 19 (1):101-116 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that transnational democracy provides the basis for a solution to the problem of the “democratic circle”—that in order for democracy to promote justice, it must already be just—at the international level. Transnational democracy could be a means to global justice. First, I briefly recount my argument for the “democratic minimum.” This minimum is freedom from domination, understood in a very specific sense. Employing Hannah Arendt's conception of freedom as “the capacity to begin,” the form of nondomination sufficient for the democratic minimum is the capability to initiate deliberation and thus democratic decision-making processes. My point in developing this argument further concerns the political form of a transnational polity: its citizens enjoy the democratic minimum as members of variousdemoi. In the case of the European Union, this leads to a potential for democratic domination. I call this thedemoiproblem, a difficulty that holds for any multilevel polity, for bounded as well as transnational political communities. Second, I argue that such domination is overcome so long as the capacity to initiate deliberation is distributed among various units and various levels. The democratic minimum could fail to obtain not only because individuals or groups are dominated by nondemocratic means, but also because they are dominated democratically to the extent that the demos of one unit lacks the normative power to initiate deliberation and thus is subordinated to others.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Democratic Experimentalism.James Bohman - 2013 - Social Philosophy Today 29:7-20.
Democratic Experimentalism.James Bohman - 2013 - Social Philosophy Today 29:7-20.
Can democracy go global?Cristina Lafont - 2010 - Ethics and Global Politics 3 (1):13-19.
Democracy and neo-liberal globalization.Mislav Kukoč - 2006 - Synthesis Philosophica 21 (2):373-383.
Our Problem of Global Justice.Shmuel Nili - 2011 - Social Theory and Practice 37 (4):629-653.
Global democratic theory: a critical introduction.Steven Slaughter - 2015 - Malden, MA: Polity Press. Edited by Steven Slaughter.
Global Democratic Theory: A Critical Introduction.Daniel Bray & Steven Slaughter - 2015 - Malden, MA: Polity. Edited by Steven Slaughter.
Human Rights Do Not Make Global Democracy.Eva Erman - 2011 - Contemporary Political Theory 10 (4):463.
Cosmopolitanism: ideals and realities.David Held - 2010 - Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Global Democracy.Christopher Chase-Dunn & Terry Boswell - 2004 - ProtoSociology 20:15-29.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
134 (#136,900)

6 months
14 (#176,812)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Bohman
PhD: Boston University; Last affiliation: Saint Louis University

Citations of this work

Republicanism and Global Justice.Cécile Laborde - 2010 - European Journal of Political Theory 9 (1):48-69.
Republican Human Rights?Duncan Ivison - 2010 - European Journal of Political Theory 9 (1):31-47.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Republicanism: a theory of freedom and government.Philip Pettit (ed.) - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press.
World Poverty and Human Rights.Thomas Pogge - 2002 - Ethics and International Affairs 19 (1):1-7.
Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government.Philip Pettit - 1999 - Philosophical Quarterly 49 (196):415-419.

View all 8 references / Add more references