A Priori Abduction

Argumentation 27 (2):167-181 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While “All events have a cause” is a synthetic statement making a factual claim about the world, “All effects have a cause” is analytic. When we take an event as an effect, no inference is required to deduce that it has a cause since this is what it means to be an effect. Some examples often given in the literature as examples of abduction work in the same way through semantic facts that follow from the way our beliefs represent those effects; from this we may deduce not only that it has a cause, but what that cause is

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-04-15

Downloads
110 (#164,978)

6 months
7 (#491,170)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Botting
De La Salle University (PhD)

Citations of this work

Johnson and the Soundness Doctrine.David Botting - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (4):501-525.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Argumentation schemes.Douglas Walton, Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno - 2008 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno.
The inference to the best explanation.Gilbert H. Harman - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (1):88-95.
The will: a dual aspect theory.Brian O'Shaughnessy - 1980 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

View all 8 references / Add more references