Social Epistemology 22 (1):71 – 95 (2008)

Authors
Philip Brey
University of Twente
Abstract
This essay presents a theory of the role of technology in the distribution and exercise of social power. The paper studies how technical artefacts and systems are used to construct, maintain or strengthen power relations between agents, whether individuals or groups, and how their introduction and use in society differentially empowers and disempowers agents. The theory is developed in three steps. First, a definition of power is proposed, based on a careful discussion of opposing definitions of power, and it is argued that a theory of power should have two components: a theory of power relations and a theory of empowerment. Second, an analysis of power relations is presented, in which five basic types of power relations between agents are distinguished, and this analysis is applied to technology, resulting in an account of the possible roles of technical artefacts in power relations. Third, I analyse how technology can lead to or contribute to empowerment and disempowerment, and what resistance strategies are possible against disempowerment through technological means. The theory of technology and power presented in this paper is claimed to be an essential ingredient of a critical theory of technology, which is a theory that analyses and critiques the role of technology in the distribution and exercise of power in society. In the final section of this paper, it is argued that the theoretical analysis of power and technology presented in this paper provides an adequate basis for the further development of such a critical theory of technology. I study how it may, specifically, be used to develop strategies for the democratization of technology.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/02691720701773551
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,247
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Do Artifacts Have Politics?Langdon Winner - 1980 - Daedalus 109 (1):121--136.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Agricultural Big Data Analytics and the Ethics of Power.Mark Ryan - 2020 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 33 (1):49-69.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Power: A Philosophical Analysis.Peter Morriss - 1989 - Manchester University Press.
Unraveling and Discovering: The Conceptual Relations Between the Concept of Power and the Concept of Empowerment.Brian Thomas - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (4):443-463.
Bourdieu and Foucault on Power and Modernity.Ciaran Cronin - 1996 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (6):55-85.
Power and Social Ontology.Åsa Andersson - 2007 - Lund: Bokbox Publications.
Rethinking Power.Amy Allen - 1998 - Hypatia 13 (1):21 - 40.
Power Trouble: Performativity as Critical Theory.Amy Allen - 1998 - Constellations 5 (4):456-471.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
130 ( #81,734 of 2,448,590 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #303,766 of 2,448,590 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes