The independence of medical ethics

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 22 (1):5-15 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper discusses the relation between medical ethics and general moral theory, the argument being that medical ethics is best seen as independent from general moral theory. According to this independence thesis, here explicated in terms of what is called a disunitarian stance, the very idea of applied ethics, which is often seen as underlying medical ethics, is misguided. We should instead think of medical ethics as a domain-specific ethical inquiry among other domain-specific ethical inquiries. On this alternative kind of picture, such ethical inquiries should start with looking at the particularities of the domain under consideration and then proceed from there. Some possible consequences of this idea for medical ethics are then identified and discussed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-05-18

Downloads
47 (#348,023)

6 months
12 (#242,943)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Johan Brännmark
Stockholm University

Citations of this work

The Moral Authority of Consensus.Paul Walker & Terence Lovat - 2022 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 47 (3):443-456.
Giving up on abstract ethical theory.Bert Gordijn & Henk ten Have - 2019 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 22 (1):1-3.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics.Onora O'Neill - 2002 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Two concepts of rules.John Rawls - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (1):3-32.

View all 25 references / Add more references