A Relational Take on Advisory Brain Implant Systems

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (4):46-47 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Gilbert (2015) warns us that advisory brain implant systems—neural implants that predict brain activity and give the user advice based on those predictions—could threaten the user's autonomy. If th...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Do Predictive Brain Implants Threaten Patient's Autonomy or Authenticity?Eldar Sarajlic - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (4):30-32.
Brain Implants as Closed-Loop Systems: Risks and Opportunities.Jordan Amadio & Nicholas M. Boulis - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (4):14-15.
A Threat to Autonomy? The Intrusion of Predictive Brain Implants.Frederic Gilbert - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (4):4-11.
Predictive Brain Implants Are Unlikely to Decrease Patients' Autonomy.David Trafimow - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (4):22-24.
Building Intricate Partnerships with Neurotechnology: Deep Brain Stimulation and Relational Agency.Timothy Brown - 2020 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 13 (1):134-154.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-22

Downloads
15 (#244,896)

6 months
9 (#1,260,759)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Timothy Emmanuel Brown
University of Washington

Citations of this work

Neuroethics.Adina Roskies - 2016 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations