Philosophia Mathematica 1 (1):50-65 (1993)
Hintikka and Sandu have recently claimed that Frege's notion of function was substantially narrower than that prevailing in real analysis today. In the present note, their textual evidence for this claim is examined in the light of relevant historical and biographical background and judged insufficient.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
How to Analyze Immediate Experience: Hintikka, Husserl, and the Idea of Phenomenology.Søren Overgaard - 2008 - Metaphilosophy 39 (3):282-304.
Comments on Quine, Prawitz, Hintikka and Sandu, and Smith.Dagfinn Føllesdal - 1994 - Synthese 98 (1):175 - 186.
Signalling in Languages with Imperfect Information.Gabriel Sandu - 2001 - Synthese 127 (1-2):21 - 34.
Reply to Hintikka and Sandu: Frege and Second-Order Logic.Richard Heck & Jason Stanley - 1993 - Journal of Philosophy 90 (8):416 - 424.
The Skeleton in Frege's Cupboard: The Standard Versus Nonstandard Distinction.Jaakko Hintikka & Gabriel Sandu - 1992 - Journal of Philosophy 89 (6):290-315.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads29 ( #177,725 of 2,172,657 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,028 of 2,172,657 )
How can I increase my downloads?