Principles and Influence in Codes of Ethics: A Centering Resonance Analysis Comparing Pre- and Post-Sarbanes-Oxley Codes of Ethics
Journal of Business Ethics 80 (2):263-278 (2008)
Abstract
This study examines the similarities and differences in pre- and post-Sarbanes-Oxley corporate ethics codes and codes of conduct using the framework of structuration theory. Following the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) legislation in 2002 in the United States, publicly traded companies there undertook development and revision of their codes of ethics in response to new regulatory requirements as well as incentives under the U.S. Corporate Sentencing Guidelines, which were also revised as part of the SOX mandates. Questions that remain are whether these new or revised codes are effective means of communicating changed ethical foci and attitudes in organizations. Centering resonance analysis (CRA) is used to identify differences and similarities across time and industries by analyzing word networks of 46 pre- and post-SOX corporate codes of ethics. Analyses focus on content and structure of generated word networks as well as resulting factors that emerged from the texts. Results are interpreted from the structuration perspective that content and structure of codes are constrained and enabled by system structures while they function to produce and reproduce those structures. Results indicate that corporate codes of ethics are formal discourses of ethics, laws, and control. Code structure has changed across time, with an increased emphasis on compliance in post-SOX codes. Implications for research and practice are discussed in light of findingsDOI
10.1007/s10551-007-9417-1
My notes
Similar books and articles
The nature of the relationship between corporate codes of ethics and behaviour.M. Schwartz - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 32 (3):247 - 262.
Historical perspectives: Development of the codes of ethics in the legal, medical and accounting professions. [REVIEW]Jeanne F. Backof & Charles L. Martin - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (2):99 - 110.
The Cut and Paste Society: Isomorphism in Codes of Ethics. [REVIEW]Lori Holder-Webb & Jeffrey Cohen - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 107 (4):485-509.
Ethical standards for human resource management professionals: A comparative analysis of five major codes. [REVIEW]Carolyn Wiley - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 25 (2):93 - 114.
A classification scheme for codes of business ethics.Bruce R. Gaumnitz & John C. Lere - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 49 (4):329-335.
A Kantian approach to codes of ethics.Jacquie L'Etang - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (10):737 - 744.
The behavioural effects of corporate ethical codes: Empirical findings and discussion.Einar Marnburg - 2000 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 9 (3):200–210.
Codes of ethics and the pursuit of organizational legitimacy: Theoretical and empirical contributions. [REVIEW]Brad S. Long & Cathy Driscoll - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 77 (2):173 - 189.
Ethical codes of conduct and organizational context: A study of the relationship between codes of conduct, employee behavior and organizational values. [REVIEW]Mark John Somers - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 30 (2):185-195.
An analysis of corporate ethical code studies: “Where do we go from here?”. [REVIEW]Betsy Stevens - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (1):63 - 69.
Journalism and moonlighting: An international comparison of 242 codes of ethics.Yehiel Limor & Itai Himelboim - 2006 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 21 (4):265 – 285.
Managers' perceptions of ethical codes: Dialectics and dynamics.Colin Fisher - 2001 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 10 (2):145–156.
Moving from Codes of Ethics to Ethical Relationships for Midwifery Practice.Faye E. Thompson - 2002 - Nursing Ethics 9 (5):522-536.
“I don’t Care that People don’t Like What I Do” – Business Codes Viewed as Invisible or Visible Restrictions.Peter Norberg - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 86 (2):211 - 225.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
90 (#138,415)
6 months
1 (#450,993)
2009-01-28
Downloads
90 (#138,415)
6 months
1 (#450,993)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Toward Effective Codes: Testing the Relationship with Unethical Behavior. [REVIEW]Muel Kaptein - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 99 (2):233 - 251.
Corporate Ethics and Compliance Programs: A Report, Analysis and Critique. [REVIEW]James Weber & David M. Wasieleski - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 112 (4):609-626.
The Effects of Ethical Codes on Ethical Perceptions of Actions Toward Stakeholders.Joseph A. McKinney, Tisha L. Emerson & Mitchell J. Neubert - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 97 (4):505 - 516.
An Updated Inquiry into the Study of Corporate Codes of Ethics: 2005–2016.Maira Babri, Bruce Davidson & Sven Helin - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 168 (1):71-108.
Quantitative content analysis as a method for business ethics research.Irina Lock & Peter Seele - 2015 - Business Ethics: A European Review 24:S24-S40.
References found in this work
The nature of the relationship between corporate codes of ethics and behaviour.M. Schwartz - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 32 (3):247 - 262.
Codes of Ethics as Signals for Ethical Behavior.Janet S. Adams, Armen Tashchian & Ted H. Shore - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 29 (3):199 - 211.
Social costs of environmental justice associated with the practice of green marketing.Janet S. Adams, Armen Tashchian & Ted H. Shore - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 29 (3):199-211.
Ethics codes and sales professionals' perceptions of their organizations' ethical values.Sean Valentine & Tim Barnett - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 40 (3):191 - 200.
The Content and Focus of the Codes of Ethics of the World's Largest Transnational Corporations.Emily F. Carasco & Jang B. Singh - 2003 - Business and Society Review 108 (1):71-94.