Aquinas on miracles: Some thoughts: Carey Aquinas and Hume on miracles

Think 5 (15):97-107 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Aquinas and Hume view miracles in starkly contrasting ways, as Thomas Carey here explains.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s1477175600002311

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Aquinas on Miracles: Some Thoughts.Thomas Carey - 2007 - Think 5 (15):97-107.
Historical insights on miracles: Babbage, Hume, Aquinas. [REVIEW]John King-Farlow - 1982 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 13 (4):209 - 218.
Overall and Aquinas on Miracles.David K. Kovacs - 2016 - Dialogue 55 (1):151-160.
Believing in Miracles.Keith Ward - 2002 - Zygon 37 (3):741-750.
Review of Fogelin, A Defense of Hume on Miracles. [REVIEW]Richard Otte - 2004 - Hume Studies 30 (1):165-68.
A Defense of Hume on Miracles. [REVIEW]Richard Otte - 2005 - Hume Studies 31 (1):165-168.
A Dissertation on Miracles.George Campbell - 1839 - Garland.
Bayes, Hume, Price, and Miracles.John Earman - 2008 - In E. Eells (ed.), Bayes's Theorem. Oxford University Press. pp. 91--110.
The "Indian Prince" in Miracle Arguments of Hume and His Predecessors and Early Critics.Lloyd F. Bitzer - 1998 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 31 (3):175-230.
Robert Fogelin's A Defense of Hume on Miracles. [REVIEW]John Beaudoin - 2004 - Journal of Value Inquiry 38 (2):281-284.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-19

Downloads
50 (#327,457)

6 months
9 (#355,374)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references