Foundations of Physics 51 (2):1-31 (2021)

Authors
Eric Cavalcanti
Griffith University
Abstract
In a recent no-go theorem [Bong et al., Nature Physics ], we proved that the predictions of unitary quantum mechanics for an extended Wigner’s friend scenario are incompatible with any theory satisfying three metaphysical assumptions, the conjunction of which we call “Local Friendliness”: Absoluteness of Observed Events, Locality and No-Superdeterminism. In this paper I discuss the implications of this theorem for QBism, as seen from the point of view of experimental metaphysics. I argue that the key distinction between QBism and realist interpretations of quantum mechanics is best understood in terms of their adherence to different theories of truth: the pragmatist versus the correspondence theories. I argue that a productive pathway to resolve the measurement problem within a pragmatist view involves taking seriously the perspective of quantum betting agents, even those in what I call a “Wigner bubble”. The notion of reality afforded by QBism, I propose, will correspond to the invariant elements of any theory that has pragmatic value to all rational agents—that is, the elements that are invariant upon changes of agent perspectives. The classical notion of ‘event’ is not among those invariants, even when those events are observed by some agent. Neither are quantum states. Nevertheless, I argue that far from solipsism, a personalist view of quantum states is an expression of its precise opposite: Copernicanism.
Keywords Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Experimental Metaphysics, Wigner's friend paradox, QBism, Pragmatism
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10701-021-00417-0
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,290
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Quantum Theory: A Pragmatist Approach.Richard Healey - 2012 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (4):729-771.
Remarks on the Mind-Body Question.E. Wigner - 2003 - In John Heil (ed.), Philosophy of Mind: A Guide and Anthology. Oxford University Press.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

QBism and Relational Quantum Mechanics compared.Jacques Pienaar - 2021 - Foundations of Physics 51 (5):1-18.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Consistent Descriptions of Quantum Measurement.Jianhao M. Yang - 2019 - Foundations of Physics 49 (11):1306-1324.
Why I Am Not a QBist.Louis Marchildon - 2015 - Foundations of Physics 45 (7):754-761.
QBism Is Not So Simply Dismissed.Ali Barzegar - 2020 - Foundations of Physics 50 (7):693-707.
Quantum Mechanics in Galilean Space-Time.Ray E. Artz - 1981 - Foundations of Physics 11 (11-12):839-862.
An Axiomatic Basis for Quantum Mechanics.Gianni Cassinelli & Pekka Lahti - 2016 - Foundations of Physics 46 (10):1341-1373.
Observation and Quantum Objectivity.Richard Healey - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (3):434-453.
QBism: An Analytical Review.Alexander A. Pechenkin - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (4):199-216.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-03-20

Total views
9 ( #954,515 of 2,518,816 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #137,692 of 2,518,816 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes