In Marcello D'Agostino, Federico Laudisa, Giulio Giorello, Telmo Pievani & Corrado Sinigaglia (eds.), New Essays in Logic and Philosophy of Science. College Publications. pp. 603--615 (2010)

Authors
Vincenzo Crupi
Università degli Studi di Torino
Abstract
We provide a 'verisimilitudinarian' analysis of the well-known Linda paradox or conjunction fallacy, i.e., the fact that most people judge the probability of the conjunctive statement "Linda is a bank teller and is active in the feminist movement" (B & F) as more probable than the isolated statement "Linda is a bank teller" (B), contrary to an uncontroversial principle of probability theory. The basic idea is that experimental participants may judge B & F a better hypothesis about Linda as compared to B because they evaluate B & F as more verisimilar than B. In fact, the hypothesis "feminist bank teller", while less likely to be true than "bank teller", may well be a better approximation to the truth about Linda.
Keywords Linda paradox  verisimilitude  truthlikeness  truth approximation  conjunction fallacy  probability
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Studies in the Way of Words.H. P. Grice - 1989 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Verisimilitudinarian Analysis of the Linda Paradox.Gustavo Cevolani, Vincenzo Crupi & Roberto Festa - 2012 - VII Conference of the Spanish Society for Logic, Methodology and Philosphy of Science.
Truth Approximation Via Abductive Belief Change.Gustavo Cevolani - 2013 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 21 (6):999-1016.
Strongly Semantic Information and Verisimilitude.Gustavo Cevolani - 2011 - Etica and Politica / Ethics and Politics (2):159-179.
The Probability of Particular Events.R. G. Swinburne - 1971 - Philosophy of Science 38 (3):327-343.
Truthmaker Gaps and the No-No Paradox.Patrick Greenough - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (3):547 - 563.
Samozwrotność i odrzucanie.Jan Woleński - 1993 - Filozofia Nauki 1.
Quantifier Probability Logic and the Confirmation Paradox.Theodore Hailperin - 2007 - History and Philosophy of Logic 28 (1):83-100.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-01-30

Total views
2,454 ( #1,090 of 2,420,823 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
423 ( #836 of 2,420,823 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes