Mencius and Dewey on Moral Perception, Deliberation, and Imagination

I argue against interpretations of Mencius by Liu Xiusheng and Eric Hutton that attempt to make sense of a Mencian account of moral judgment and deliberation in light of the moral particularism of John McDowell. These interpretations read Mencius’s account as relying on a faculty of moral perception, which generates moral judgments by directly perceiving moral facts that are immediately intuited with the help of rudimentary and innate moral inclinations. However, I argue that it is a mistake to identify innate moral inclinations as the foundational source of moral judgments and knowledge. Instead, if we understand that for Mencius an individual’s natural dispositions (xing 性) have a relational element, then the normativity of moral judgments can be seen as stemming from the relationships that constitute the dispositions of each individual. Finally, this essay elaborates on John Dewey's account of moral deliberation as moral imagination, an account which also takes the relational quality of natural dispositions as its starting point, in order to suggest the vital role of imagination for Mencius’s own account of moral deliberation.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11712-012-9276-z
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,191
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Mind, Value, and Reality.John Henry McDowell - 1998 - Harvard University Press.
Mencius.D. C. Lau - 2005 - Penguin Classics.
Virtue, Reason, and Principle.R. Jay Wallace - 1991 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21 (4):469-495.
Theory of the Moral Life.John Dewey - 1960 - Irvington Publishers.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
A Defence of Mencius' Ethical Naturalism.James A. Ryan - 1997 - Asian Philosophy 7 (1):23 – 36.
Moral Philosophy and Moral Psychology in Mencius.James A. Ryan - 1998 - Asian Philosophy 8 (1):47 – 64.
Against Moral Particularism.Mary Tjiattas - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:19-24.
On the Intersection of Casuistry and Particularism.Gregory E. Kaebnick - 2000 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (4):307-322.
Mencius's Vertical Faculties and Moral Nativism.Bongrae Seok - 2008 - Asian Philosophy 18 (1):51 – 68.
Moral Instinct and Moral Judgment.Liangkang Ni - 2009 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (2):238-250.
The Role of Moral Imagination in Patients' Decision-Making.K. Rommetveit, J. L. Scully & R. Porz - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (2):160-172.
Emotional Control and Virtue in the "Mencius".Manyul Im - 1999 - Philosophy East and West 49 (1):1-27.
Moral Judgment and Emotions.Kyle Swan - 2004 - Journal of Value Inquiry 38 (3):375-381.
Moral Psychology and the Mencian Creature.David Morrow - 2009 - Philosophical Psychology 22 (3):281-304.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

10 ( #433,198 of 2,172,602 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #325,029 of 2,172,602 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums