Authors
James Christensen
University of Essex
Abstract
This article begins by distinguishing between two approaches to egalitarian trade justice – the explicative approach and the applicative approach – and notes that the former has been used to defend conclusions that are less strongly egalitarian than those defended by advocates of the latter. The article then engages with the primary explicative account of trade egalitarianism – that offered by Aaron James – and argues that its egalitarian conclusions are unduly minimalistic. The aim of the article is not to criticize the explicative approach, but rather to show that the arguments and commitments of its best-known defender – James – either fail to rule out, or in fact positively support, more robustly egalitarian conclusions.
Keywords International Trade  Egalitarianism  Equality  Distributive Justice  Aaron James  Trade Justice  Global Justice
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Global Distributive Justice: An Introduction.Chris Armstrong - 2012 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Justice and International Trade.Helena Bres - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (10):570-579.
Freedom and Justice in Trade Governance.Sarah C. Goff - 2020 - Ethics and International Affairs 34 (3):401-412.
Distributive Justice and International Trade.Ethan B. Kapstein - 1999 - Ethics and International Affairs 13:175–204.
Autarky as a Moral Baseline.Kristi A. Olson - 2014 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44 (2):264-285.
Equality Versus Priority.Michael Otsuka & Alex Voorhoeve - 2018 - In Serena Olsaretti (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Distributive Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 65-85.
Being Realistic About International Trade Justice.Christian Neuhäuser - 2018 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 5 (2):181-204.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2022-03-06

Total views
18 ( #611,365 of 2,520,788 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #46,380 of 2,520,788 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes