Lucretius’ Razor on Epicurus’ Atomic Theory

Classical Quarterly 73 (1):160-168 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article investigates why Lucretius does not dedicate any section of his poem to atomic size or provide a technical term to describe the concept. This absence is particularly significant because Epicurus’ Letter to Herodotus both uses the term μέγεθος to indicate atomic size and contains a passage reporting specifically on this property. First, the article argues that atomic size and shape are causally redundant in Epicurus’ ontology. Second, it demonstrates that the origin of both shape and size is found in the smallest magnitudes in Epicurean physics, the minima. Drawing on these findings, it concludes that, since atomic size violates the law of parsimony, it is a superfluous entity in the Epicurean system. After analysing passages from the De rerum natura, it suggests that the absence of atomic size in Lucretius may be deliberate. Lucretius’ microphysics works perfectly without introducing a philosophical notion of atomic size, and is more economical and efficient than that of Epicurus.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Epicurus and Lucretius on the Creation of the Cosmos.Eliopoulos Panos - 2015 - Философия И Космология 14 (1):248-254.
Lucretius and the history of science.Monte Johnson & Catherine Wilson - 2007 - In Stuart Gillespie & Philip R. Hardie (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge University Press.
The philosophy of Epicurus.George K. Epicurus, Titus Strodach & Lucretius Carus - 2019 - [Evanston, Ill.]: Dover Publicatons. Edited by George K. Strodach & Titus Lucretius Carus.
Lucretius and Scientific Thought. [REVIEW]E. B. C. - 1965 - Review of Metaphysics 18 (3):596-596.
Lucretius' arguments on the swerve and free-action.Basil Evangelidis - 2019 - Landmarks in the Philosophy, Ethics and History of Science.
The Epicureanism of Lucretius.Tim O'Keefe - 2022 - In David Konstan, Myrto Garani & Gretchen Reydams-Schils (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Roman Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, Usa. pp. 143-158.
The Philosophy of Epicurus. [REVIEW]B. D. A. - 1963 - Review of Metaphysics 17 (2):310-310.
The Deleuze-Lucretius Encounter.Ryan J. Johnson - 2017 - Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
Lucretius’ prolepsis.Chiara Rover - 2022 - Elenchos: Rivista di Studi Sul Pensiero Antico 43 (2):279-314.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-08-04

Downloads
28 (#565,512)

6 months
20 (#128,866)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Epicurus' Scientific Method.A. A. Long & Elizabeth Asmis - 1988 - Philosophical Review 97 (2):249.
The Greek Atomists and Epicurus.Richard Robinson & Cyril Bailey - 1931 - Philosophical Review 40 (1):89.

Add more references