Fallacies and formal logic in Aristotle

History and Philosophy of Logic 21 (3):207-221 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The taxonomy and analysis of fallacies in Aristotle's Sophistical Refutations pre-date the formal logic of his Prior Analytics A4-6. Of the 64 fully described examples of ?sophistical refutations? which are fallacious because they are only apparently valid, 49 have the wrong number of premisses or the wrong form of premiss or conclusion for analysis by the Prior Analytics theory of the categorical syllogism. The rest Aristotle either frames so that they do not look like categorical syllogisms or analyses in a quite different way than by categorical syllogistic

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The power of logic.Frances Howard-Snyder - 2012 - New York: McGraw-Hill. Edited by Daniel Howard-Snyder & Ryan Wasserman.
What is a Sophistical Refutation?David Botting - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (2):213-232.
Fallacies of Accident.David Botting - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (2):267-289.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
79 (#210,156)

6 months
8 (#351,446)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The Development of Logic.William Kneale & Martha Kneale - 1962 - Oxford, England: Clarendon Press. Edited by Martha Kneale.
The development of logic.W. C. Kneale - 1962 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Martha Kneale.
The Development of Logic.William Kneale & Martha Kneale - 1962 - Studia Logica 15:308-310.
The Development of Logic.William Kneale & Martha Kneale - 1962 - Philosophy 40 (151):79-83.
Aristotle's Prior and Posterior Analytics.W. D. Ross - 1949 - Philosophy 25 (95):380-382.

View all 16 references / Add more references