History and Philosophy of Logic 21 (3):207-221 (2000)
The taxonomy and analysis of fallacies in Aristotle's Sophistical Refutations pre-date the formal logic of his Prior Analytics A4-6. Of the 64 fully described examples of ?sophistical refutations? which are fallacious because they are only apparently valid, 49 have the wrong number of premisses or the wrong form of premiss or conclusion for analysis by the Prior Analytics theory of the categorical syllogism. The rest Aristotle either frames so that they do not look like categorical syllogisms or analyses in a quite different way than by categorical syllogistic
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
A Greek-English Lexicon.Paul Maas, H. G. Liddell, Robert Scott & Henry Stuart Jones - 1927 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 47:154.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Aristotle's Use of Examples in the "Prior Analytics".Katerina Ierodiakonou - 2002 - Phronesis 47 (2):127 - 152.
Completion, Reduction and Analysis: Three Proof-Theoretic Processes in Aristotle'sprior Analytics.George Boger - 1998 - History and Philosophy of Logic 19 (4):187-226.
Aristotle on False Reasoning: Language and the World in the Sophistical Refutations.Scott G. Schreiber - 2003 - State University of New York Press.
Aristotle's Prior Analytics Book I: Translated with an Introduction and Commentary.Gisela Striker - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads45 ( #115,489 of 2,168,640 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #187,136 of 2,168,640 )
How can I increase my downloads?