Fallacies and formal logic in Aristotle

History and Philosophy of Logic 21 (3):207-221 (2000)
The taxonomy and analysis of fallacies in Aristotle's Sophistical Refutations pre-date the formal logic of his Prior Analytics A4-6. Of the 64 fully described examples of ?sophistical refutations? which are fallacious because they are only apparently valid, 49 have the wrong number of premisses or the wrong form of premiss or conclusion for analysis by the Prior Analytics theory of the categorical syllogism. The rest Aristotle either frames so that they do not look like categorical syllogisms or analyses in a quite different way than by categorical syllogistic
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/0144534001022004
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,507
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Development of Logic.W. C. Kneale - 1962 - Oxford University Press.
A History of Formal Logic.I. M. Bocheński & Ivo Thomas - 1961 - Science and Society 27 (4):492-494.
Prior Analytics. Aristotle - 1989 - Kessinger Publishing.
Aristotle's Prior and Posterior Analytics.W. D. Ross - 1949 - Philosophy 25 (95):380-382.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total downloads
49 ( #126,232 of 2,268,146 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #373,366 of 2,268,146 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature