Differential pragmatic abilities and autism spectrum disorders: The case of pragmatic determinants of literal content

Abstract

It has become something of a truism that people with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) have difficulties with pragmatics. Granting this, however, it is important to keep in mind that there are numerous kinds of pragmatic ability. One very important divide lies between those pragmatic competences which pertain to non-literal contents – as in, for instance, metaphor, irony and Gricean conversational implicatures – and those which pertain to the literal contents of speech acts. It is against this backdrop that our question arises: Are certain pragmatic tasks more difficult than others for people with ASD?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,998

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-12-11

Downloads
61 (#264,139)

6 months
1 (#1,473,216)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Stainton
Western University

References found in this work

Literal Meaning.François Récanati - 2002 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Logic and Conversation.H. Paul Grice - 1975 - In Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy. Broadview Press. pp. 47.

View all 23 references / Add more references