Mistaking randomness for free will

Consciousness and Cognition 20 (3):965-971 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Belief in free will is widespread. The present research considered one reason why people may believe that actions are freely chosen rather than determined: they attribute randomness in behavior to free will. Experiment 1 found that participants who were prompted to perform a random sequence of actions experienced their behavior as more freely chosen than those who were prompted to perform a deterministic sequence. Likewise, Experiment 2 found that, all else equal, the behavior of animated agents was perceived to be more freely chosen if it consisted of a random sequence of actions than if it consisted of a deterministic sequence; this was true even when the degree of randomness in agents’ behavior was largely a product of their environments. Together, these findings suggest that randomness in behavior—one’s own or another’s—can be mistaken for free will

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Lowness and $\Pi _{2}^{0}$ Nullsets.Rod Downey, Andre Nies, Rebecca Weber & Liang Yu - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (3):1044 - 1052.
Chance versus Randomness.Antony Eagle - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Schnorr Randomness.Rodney G. Downey & Evan J. Griffiths - 2004 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 69 (2):533 - 554.
Free agency and laws of nature.Robert H. Kane - 2005 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 12 (1):46-53.
Randomness Is Unpredictability.Antony Eagle - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):749-790.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-08-17

Downloads
261 (#73,982)

6 months
17 (#132,430)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?