Politics, Philosophy and Economics 12 (3):228-246 (2013)
AbstractThe article responds to an influential critique of the view that there is a conceptual distinction between kinds of liberty. The critique in question began with Gerald MacCallum Jr’s famous argument that liberty is a single concept that has a triadic structure between agent, constraint, and end. Against this view, the article argues that the triadic structure offered by MacCallum is unable to conceptualize a particular distinct understanding of liberty. Following Charles Taylor, the article defends the view that there is a distinct ‘exercise-concept’ of liberty that the triadic structure cannot account for. In support of this claim, the article contests a recent argument that an exercise-concept of liberty can be conceptualized in terms of the triadic structure. The article argues that the triadic framework can only conceptualize an exercise-concept of liberty at the cost of abandoning the substance of that framework. To defend this, the article explains that the triadic structure and an exercise-concept are basically conceptually distinct in virtue of the fact that the former embodies a ‘static’ concept, whereas the latter embodies a ‘dynamic’ one. To complete the argument that an exercise-concept is a distinct concept of liberty, the article articulates a common theme that unifies both the triadic structure and an exercise-concept as concepts of liberty.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government.Philip Pettit (ed.) - 1997 - Oxford University Press.
Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government.Philip Pettit - 1999 - Philosophical Quarterly 49 (196):415-419.
Similar books and articles
Berlin’s Two Concepts of Positive Liberty.Janos Kis - 2013 - European Journal of Political Theory 12 (1):31-48.
Liberty.Matt Zwolinski - 2009 - In John Shand (ed.), Central Issues in Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 275--286.
Non-Domination as a Moral Ideal.Christian Nadeau - 2003 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (1):120-134.
Giving Liberty Its Due, But No More: Trans Fats, Liberty, and Public Health.Dr James Wilson - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (3):34-36.
A Third Concept of Liberty: Judgment and Freedom in Kant and Adam Smith.Samuel Fleischacker - 1999 - Princeton University Press.
Power Tends to Corrupt: Lord Acton's Study of Liberty.Christopher Lazarski - 2012 - Northern Illinois University Press.
Liberty, Mill and the Framework of Public Health Ethics.Madison Powers, Ruth Faden & Yashar Saghai - 2012 - Public Health Ethics 5 (1):6-15.
Review of Narveson and Sterba's Are Liberty and Equality Compatible? [REVIEW]Kevin Currie-Knight - 2011 - Libertarian Papers 3.
Liberty as Power.Preston King - 1999 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 2 (3):1-25.
Is Liberty Bad for Your Health? Towards a Moderate View of the Robust Coequality of Liberty and Health.M. Allen - 2011 - Public Health Ethics 4 (3):260-268.