- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Max Weber in Scientific Controversies. On the Occasion of New Translations
Sociology of Power 32 (4):167-179 (2020)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Genuine versus bogus scientific controversies: the case of statins.Carlo Martini & Mattia Andreoletti - 2021 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 43 (4):1-23.
Science, rhetoric, and the sociology of knowledge: a critique of Dascal's view of scientific controversies.Kanavillil Rajagopalan - 2002 - Manuscrito 25 (2):433-464.
On the Cognitive Analysis o f Scientific Controversies.Richard E. Grandy - 2000 - In Peter K. Machamer, Marcello Pera & Aristeidēs Baltas (eds.), Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 67.
Scientific controversies: An introduction.P. Machamer, M. Pera & A. Baltas - 2000 - In Peter K. Machamer, Marcello Pera & Aristeidēs Baltas (eds.), Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 3--17.
Classifying scientific controversies.Aristides Baltas - 2000 - In Peter K. Machamer, Marcello Pera & Aristeidēs Baltas (eds.), Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 40.
Rhetoric and scientific controversies.Marcello Pera - 2000 - In Peter K. Machamer, Marcello Pera & Aristeidēs Baltas (eds.), Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 50.
Patterns of scientific controversies.Philip Kitcher - 2000 - In Peter K. Machamer, Marcello Pera & Aristeidēs Baltas (eds.), Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 21.
Controversies in Science.Lynda Dunlop & Fernanda Veneu - 2019 - Science & Education 28 (6-7):689-710.
Max Weber in the Post-World War II US and After.Robert Antonio - 2005 - Etica E Politica 7 (2):1-94.
How Not to Save Searle: A Reply to Weber’s Reply.R. D'Amico & W. Butchard - 2012 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (3):445-448.
Scientific Controversies. A Socio-Historical Perspective on the Advancement of Science.Dominique Raynaud - 2015 - New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers. Edited by Lisa C. Chien.
Analytics
Added to PP
2024-01-30
Downloads
3 (#1,725,134)
6 months
3 (#1,037,581)
2024-01-30
Downloads
3 (#1,725,134)
6 months
3 (#1,037,581)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-8fb5884b9-pwpjr uwo