Foundations of Science 19 (3):217-239 (2014)
AbstractScholars concerned with the foundations of quantum mechanics (QM) usually think that contextuality (hence nonobjectivity of physical properties, which implies numerous problems and paradoxes) is an unavoidable feature of QM which directly follows from the mathematical apparatus of QM. Based on some previous papers on this issue, we criticize this view and supply a new informal presentation of the extended semantic realism (ESR) model which embodies the formalism of QM into a broader mathematical formalism and reinterprets quantum probabilities as conditional on detection rather than absolute. Because of this reinterpretation a hidden variables theory can be constructed which justifies the assumptions introduced in the ESR model and proves its objectivity. When applied to special cases the ESR model settles long-standing conflicts (it reconciles Bell’s inequalities with QM), provides a general framework in which previous results obtained by other authors (as local interpretations of the GHZ experiment) are recovered and explained, and supports an interpretation of quantum logic which avoids the introduction of the problematic notion of quantum truth
Similar books and articles
The Quantum Harmonic Oscillator in the ESR Model.Sandro Sozzo - 2013 - Foundations of Physics 43 (6):792-804.
The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument and the Bell Inequalities.László E. Szabó - 2007 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Quantum Theory, Reconsideration of Foundations 4: Växjö (Sweden), 11-16 June, 2007.Guillaume Adenier (ed.) - 2007 - American Institute of Physics.
Reassessment of Leggett Inequality.Antonio Di Lorenzo - 2013 - Foundations of Physics 43 (5):685-698.
Contextual hidden variables theories and Bell’s inequalities.Abner Shimony - 1984 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (1):25-45.
Bell's inequalities, relativistic quantum field theory and the problem of hidden variables.Miklós Rédei - 1991 - Philosophy of Science 58 (4):628-638.
A Preliminary Experimental Verification of Violation of Bell Inequality in a Quantum Model of Jung Theory of Personality Formulated with Clifford Algebra.Elio Conte - 2010 - Journal of Consciousness Exploration and Research 1 (7):831-849.
Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy.John Stewart Bell - 2004 - Cambridge University Press.
May We Verify Non-Existing Dispersion Free Ensembles By Application of Quantum Mechanics in Experiments at Perceptive and Cognitive Level?Elio Conte - 2012 - Neuroquantology 10 (1):14-19.
Philosophen in der mikrowelt — ratlos?Manfred Stöckler - 1986 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 17 (1):68-95.
Schwinger and the ontology of quantum field theory.Edward MacKinnon - 2007 - Foundations of Science 12 (4):295-323.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
An Epistemic Interpretation of Quantum Probability via Contextuality.Claudio Garola - 2020 - Foundations of Science 25 (1):105-120.
Demolishing Prejudices to Get to the Foundations: A Criterion of Demarcation for Fundamentality.Flavio Del Santo & Chiara Cardelli - 2020 - Foundations of Science 25 (3):827-843.
References found in this work
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry Into the Conceptual Foundations of Science.Norwood Russell Hanson - 1958 - Cambridge University Press.
Aspects of scientific explanation.Carl G. Hempel - 1965 - In Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Free Press. pp. 504.
The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics: The Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics in Historical Perspective.Max Jammer - 1974 - New York: Wiley.