Inept reasoners or pragmatic virtuosos? Relevance and the deontic selection task
Cognition 81 (2):B69-B76 (2001)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Relevance and digressions in argumentative discussion: A pragmatic approach.Scott Jacobs & Sally Jackson - 1992 - Argumentation 6 (2):161-176.
Does reasoning occur on the selection task? A comparison of relevance-based theories.David Hardman - 1998 - Thinking and Reasoning 4 (4):353 – 376.
Conditional reasoning and the Wason selection task: Biconditional interpretation instead of reasoning bias.Pascal Wagner-Egger - 2007 - Thinking and Reasoning 13 (4):484 – 505.
Reasoning with deontic and counterfactual conditionals.Ana Cristina Quelhas & Ruth Byrne - 2003 - Thinking and Reasoning 9 (1):43 – 65.
On the non-availability of Dawson-modeling into certain relevance alethic modal logics.John Chidgey - 1979 - Studia Logica 38 (2):89 - 94.
A little logic goes a long way: basing experiment on semantic theory in the cognitive science of conditional reasoning.Keith Stenning & Michiel Lambalgen - 2004 - Cognitive Science 28 (4):481-529.
ELIZABETH S. SPELKE (MIT) Children's use of geometry and landmarks to reorient in an open space, 119±148 JENNY R. SAFFRAN (University of Wisconsin±Madison) Words in a sea of sounds: the output of infant statistical learning, 149±169 Brief articles. [REVIEW]Marc Pomplun, Eyal M. Reingold, Jiye Shen, Vittorio Girotto, Markus Kemmelmeier, Dan Sperber, Jean-Baptiste van der Henst, Edward Munnich, Barbara Landau & Barbara Anne Dosher - 2001 - Cognition 81 (249):249-251.
Pragmatic connectives, argumentative coherence and relevance.Jacques Moeschler - 1989 - Argumentation 3 (3):321-339.
Matching versus optimal data selection in the Wason selection task.Hiroshi Yama - 2001 - Thinking and Reasoning 7 (3):295 – 311.
Modus tollens, modus shmollens: Contrapositive reasoning and the pragmatics of negation. Jean-Fran - 2007 - Thinking and Reasoning 13 (2):207 – 222.
Sharing-rule and detection of free-riders in cooperative groups: Evolutionarily important deontic reasoning in the Wason selection task.Kai Hiraishi & Toshikazu Hasegawa - 2001 - Thinking and Reasoning 7 (3):255 – 294.
Think-aloud protocols and the selection task: Evidence for relevance effects and rationalisation processes.Erica Lucas & Linden Ball - 2005 - Thinking and Reasoning 11 (1):35 – 66.
Discussion de-focusing on the Wason selection task: Mental models or mental inference rules? A commentary on green and larking (1995).David K. Hardman - 1998 - Thinking and Reasoning 4 (1):83 – 94.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
21 (#543,512)
6 months
1 (#451,971)
2014-01-20
Downloads
21 (#543,512)
6 months
1 (#451,971)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.Dan Sperber - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):57.
Relevance theory.Deirdre Wilson & Dan Sperber - 2002 - In L. Horn & G. Ward (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics. Blackwell. pp. 607-632.
Domain-general contributions to social reasoning: theory of mind and deontic reasoning re-explored.Margaret C. McKinnon & Morris Moscovitch - 2007 - Cognition 102 (2):179-218.
A little logic goes a long way: basing experiment on semantic theory in the cognitive science of conditional reasoning.Keith Stenning & Michiel Lambalgen - 2004 - Cognitive Science 28 (4):481-529.
A little logic goes a long way: basing experiment on semantic theory in the cognitive science of conditional reasoning.Keith Stenning & Michiel van Lambalgen - 2004 - Cognitive Science 28 (4):481-529.
References found in this work
The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task.Leda Cosmides - 1989 - Cognition 31 (3):187-276.
Reasoning.Peter C. Wason - 1966 - In B. Foss (ed.), New Horizons in Psychology. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books. pp. 135-151.
Pragmatic reasoning schemas.Patricia W. Cheng & Keith J. Holyoak - 1985 - Cognitive Psychology 17 (4):391-416.
Domain-specific reasoning: Social contracts, cheating, and perspective change.Gerd Gigerenzer & Klaus Hug - 1992 - Cognition 43 (2):127-171.
