Toward a Duty to Report Clinical Trials Accurately: The Clinical Alert and Beyond

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 22 (4):327-338 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Advances in medicine depend not only on the generation of information but also on its dissemination. Clinically relevant data must be transmitted to the practitioners who will use it. Health care professionals in North America are aware of their ethical and legal obligations to inform patients adequately concerning interventions and treatments so that they may make informed choices about medical care. This obligation has been well described and defined by the courts and in the literature of medicine, ethics, and law. But do investigators and others who are responsible for disseminating information have any obligation to divulge adequately the results of clinical trials to practitioners so that the latter might offer the choice of appropriate care to their patients? Can incomplete disclosure of trial outcomes result in harm to patients? If this is the case, what possible avenues are available to avoid such harm?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

“Green informed consent” in the classroom, clinic, and consultation room.Cristina Richie - 2023 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 26 (4):507-515.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
14 (#1,019,271)

6 months
2 (#1,259,919)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Letters to the Editor.Ellen D. Burgess - 1995 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 23 (2):211-212.
Letters to the Editor.Ellen D. Burgess - 1995 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 23 (2):211-212.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references