Permitting patients to pay for participation in clinical trials: the advent of the P4 trial

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 20 (2):219-227 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article we explore the ethical issues raised by permitting patients to pay for participation (P4) in clinical trials, and discuss whether there are any categorical objections to this practice. We address key considerations concerning payment for participation in trials, including patient autonomy, risk/benefit and justice, taking account of two previous critiques of the ethics of P4. We conclude that such trials could be ethical under certain strict conditions, but only if other potential sources of funding have first been explored or are unavailable.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Payment for research participation: a coercive offer?A. Wertheimer & F. G. Miller - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (5):389-392.
Research Ethics and Misguided Moral Intuition.Franklin G. Miller - 2004 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (1):111-116.
Diagnostic Justice: Testing for Covid-19.Ashley Graham Kennedy & Bryan Cwik - 2021 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 17 (2):(SI2)5-25.
Ethical Considerations for the Enrollment of Cancer Patients in Clinical Trials.Adil Shamoo - forthcoming - Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal.
Xenotransplantation Clinical Trials and Equitable Patient Selection.Christopher Bobier & Daniel Rodger - forthcoming - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics:1-10.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-20

Downloads
15 (#976,359)

6 months
39 (#100,216)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David M. Shaw
University of Basel

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations