Killing, Letting Die, and Euthanasia

Analysis 40 (4):224 - (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Death is not always an evil for the person who dies. The implication for euthanasia is clear-cut. When death counts as a good for someone, directly killing the person would be no worse, and might be better, than merely allowing her to die.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Killing, Letting Die, and Euthanasia.Joseph L. Lombardi - 1981 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 55:250-259.
Killing, letting die and euthanasia.D. N. Husak - 1979 - Journal of Medical Ethics 5 (4):200-202.
An Irrelevant Consideration: Killing Versus Letting Die (2nd edition).Michael Tooley - 1994 - In Bonnie Steinbock & Alastair Norcross (eds.), Killing and letting die. New York: Fordham University Press. pp. 103–111.
Euthanasia and the Distinction Between Acts and Omissions.Winston Nesbitt - 1993 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 10 (2):253-256.
An Irrelevant Consideration: Killing Versus Letting Die.Michael Tooley - 1994 - In Bonnie Steinbock & Alastair Norcross (eds.), Killing and letting die. New York: Fordham University Press. pp. 56–62.
Death is Not Always the Greatest Evil: Killing and Letting Die in Bioethics.James Green - 2002 - Dissertation, Queen's University at Kingston (Canada)

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
213 (#15,281)

6 months
19 (#786,843)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Is medically assisted death a special obligation?Eduardo Rivera-López - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (6):401-406.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references