A Quantum-Theoretic Argument Against Naturalism

In Bruce L. Gordon & William A. Dembski (eds.), The Nature of Nature: Examining the Role of Naturalism in Science. Wilmington, DE: ISI Books. pp. 179-214 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Quantum theory offers mathematical descriptions of measurable phenomena with great facility and accuracy, but it provides absolutely no understanding of why any particular quantum outcome is observed. It is the province of genuine explanations to tell us how things actually work—that is, why such descriptions hold and why such predictions are true. Quantum theory is long on the what, both mathematically and observationally, but almost completely silent on the how and the why. What is even more interesting is that, in some sense, this state of affairs seems to be a necessary consequence of the empirical adequacy of quantum descriptions. One of the most noteworthy achievements of quantum theory is the accurate prediction of phenomena that, on pain of experimental contradiction, have no physical explanation. It is the purpose of this essay to make clear why quantum mechanics and quantum field theory are complete physical descriptions that describe the metaphysical incompleteness of the physical world, then to press the negative implications of this fact for naturalistic metaphysics.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nature as Sacred Ground: A Metaphysics for Religious Naturalism by Donald A. Crosby.Scot D. Yoder - 2017 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 38 (2):232-235.
The Being of Nature: Dewey, Buchler, and the Prospect for an Eco-Ontology.Thomas Alexander - 2010 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (4):544-569.
Mind and World: From Soft Naturalism to Anti-naturalism.R. C. Pradhan - 2016 - Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 33 (1):1-22.
Naturalism.Geert Keil - 2008 - In Dermot Moran (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Twentieth-Century Philosophy. London: Routledge. pp. 254-307.
Naturalism, Experience, and Hume’s ‘Science of Human Nature’.Benedict Smith - 2016 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 24 (3):310-323.
Naturalism.Graham Oppy - 2020 - Think 19 (56):7-20.
Naturalismus.Geert Keil & Herbert Schnädelbach - 2000 - In Geert Keil & Herbert Schnädelbach (eds.), Naturalismus. Suhrkamp. pp. 7-45.
Science Evolving. [REVIEW]Ray Scott Percival - 1995 - Nature 376 (6536):131-132.


Added to PP

400 (#50,684)

6 months
205 (#13,510)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bruce Gordon
Northwestern University (PhD)

Citations of this work

A New Reliability Defeater for Evolutionary Naturalism.William J. Talbott - 2016 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 93 (3):538-564.
Is epistemic circularity a fallacy?William J. Talbott - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (8):2277-2298.
On Mathematical Anti-Evolutionism.Jason Rosenhouse - 2016 - Science & Education 25 (1-2):95-114.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Every thing must go: metaphysics naturalized.James Ladyman & Don Ross - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Don Ross, David Spurrett & John G. Collier.
The metaphysics within physics.Tim Maudlin - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Warrant and proper function.Alvin Plantinga - 1993 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 74 references / Add more references