Benchmarking of corporate social responsibility: Methodological problems and robustness [Book Review]

Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):137-152 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper investigates the possibilities and problems of benchmarking Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). After a methodological analysis of the advantages and problems of benchmarking, we develop a benchmark method that includes economic, social and environmental aspects as well as national and international aspects of CSR. The overall benchmark is based on a weighted average of these aspects. The weights are based on the opinions of companies and NGO's. Using different methods of weighting, we find that the outcome of the benchmark is rather robust for a sample of more than 50 large Dutch companies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,088

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Profits and Principles.Colin P. Higgins - 2005 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:130-135.
Corporate Social Responsibility.Paul C. Godfrey, Nile A. Hatch & Jared M. Hansen - 2005 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:112-117.
Practicing the business of corporate social responsibility: a process perspective.Christa Thomsen & Jakob Lauring - 2008 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 4 (2):117.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
63 (#237,467)

6 months
5 (#311,051)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

J. J. Graafland
Tilburg University

References found in this work

Value in ethics and economics.Elizabeth Anderson - 1993 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
An introduction to business ethics.George D. Chryssides - 1993 - New York: Chapman & Hall. Edited by John H. Kaler.
Cost-benefit analysis and procedural values.Douglas MacLean - 1994 - Analyse & Kritik 16 (2):166-180.

View all 10 references / Add more references